To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27679
27678  |  27680
Subject: 
Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:46:38 GMT
Viewed: 
1529 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   I’m shocked. I’m also kidding.

The most interesting thing to me about this study is the motivation of the researchers. When the day is done and the results are in, it simply amounts to patting oneself on the back. This is research?

I read about this on a certain Other Forum and basically said “eh.”

lol For the record, I signed up again with yet another email addy, and was summarily nuked; they must checking IPs. I have officially given up life in the underground. Pity.

   It’s a too-small sample size from a too-small geographic area. I’d say it’s close to meaningless, and in any case the factors of adolescent life and parental leanings likely weigh more upon one’s political destination that does one’s own “whininess.”

Agreed.

   Of the few dozen former high school classmates I’ve been able (or inclined) to track down, very nearly all of them gravitated to exactly the political affiliation I would have predicted, myself included. The indicators present in adolescence are probably more reliable than the relative “whininess” of a toddler.

I wasn’t a whiney child (so I’m told), and I did grow up liberal, but I gradually saw the proverbial light and grew conservative. What bothers me most about this (to Tim as well) is it assumes that people are cast somehow in their political viewpoints. Doesn’t make sense to assume that, it seems to me.

   Even if that whiny “toddler” is a six-foot-five demagogue who hosts a three-hour daily radio show plus a daily hour-long primetime TV show...

D’oh. I’m only good on TV references pre-nineties. Is that a stern jab?

JOHN



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
 
--SNIP-- (...) ???? (...) Disagree. One hundred people is a decent amount (error is proportional to 1/sqrt(sample size)). Besides, if the sample size was considered inadequate in a statistical sense by the experts in the field who review the paper (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
 
(...) Good guess, but actually, it was a not-so-stern jab at Bill O'Reilly. I'm not sure, but I don't think that Howard currently has a primetime show. And anyway, he's more of a kvetcher than a whiner. Dave! (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A Berkeley Study That Portrays Liberalism Positively?!!
 
(...) I read about this on a certain Other Forum and basically said "eh." It's a too-small sample size from a too-small geographic area. I'd say it's close to meaningless, and in any case the factors of adolescent life and parental leanings likely (...) (19 years ago, 22-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

18 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR