Subject:
|
Re: Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:34:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1380 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
|
|
| |
| |
And besides, you aren’t really an “atheist” now are you, Dave!? (he asked
knowingly)
|
I hear that all the time, and it baffles me!
Besides, I’ve told you before--if it weren’t for that pesky “faith” stuff, I
could probably get right on board--there’s room for many a-more, after
all.
|
lol, my veiled point was making a distinction between the definition of the term
“atheism” and one such as “agnostic”, which I assume that you are
(technically).
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
| (...) I've heard the argument that since an agnostic doesn't actively believe in god, they are technically a subset of atheists. I might call it 'soft atheism' versus 'hard atheism.' This is actually something I've been thinking about recently. How (...) (19 years ago, 24-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Heads Up, Non-Atheists
|
| (...) Probably true, and it's a shame. We've discussed Pat Robertson before, and what a shame it would be if he were everyone's idea of a "typical" Christian. (...) I hear that all the time, and it baffles me! Besides, I've told you before--if it (...) (19 years ago, 23-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
