 | | Re: My top 10
|
|
Hi Borislav - First off, I'm quoting your message with one of the latter paragraphs first: (...) I would suggest if you want to make your point and have it be well accepted by the person you are targeting it at, you try not to insult them or attack (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My top 10
|
|
(...) I did. You've explained your opinion well in the new post. (...) I never mentioned that it would prevent me from being able to express my ideas or opinions. I merely point out that my credibility isn't the same and therefore wouldn't hold as (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: My top 10
|
|
(...) I just made a new post where I snipped out the specific issues that I feel need to be addressed. Please take a look at it. (...) You are correct that you would not have the same status/recognition. But that would not prevent you from sharing (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: My top 10
|
|
(...) Where did Bryce once mention that posting MOCs is a requirement for participation? I've read his message numerous times now and I don't see where he mentions this at all. By this logic, I should be able to post in .train and have similar (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: America at Work, or When in Doubt -- Shred It!
|
|
(...) Assuming you meant "funding", well, politicians make lots of noises about that but invariably don't bite the hand they feed themselves with. It's pretty much legalized bribery as long as you jump through the right hoops. It's really up to the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: America at Work, or When in Doubt -- Shred It!
|
|
(...) What ever happened to the moves to reform party finding in the US? Has “patriotism” swept that aside too? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: America at Work, or When in Doubt -- Shred It!
|
|
(...) There is nothing wrong with a bit of conjecture. Bush is used to it. :) (...) You make it sound like the American dream has been attained. Has it? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: America at Work, or When in Doubt -- Shred It!
|
|
(...) I think any pundit could have predicted this even by gazing into Willa the Witch's Lego crystal ball. :-) We are going to see a lot of politicians scurrying about like cockroaches once some light is shed on their part in this. (...) The only (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: America at Work, or When in Doubt -- Shred It!
|
|
(...) I dunno, I am willing to believe that Bush, et al had their collective hands deep inside the cookie jar here -- but that is conjecture only. (...) Wait until we get social security reform, or dispense with it altogether, and then perhaps the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: America at Work, or When in Doubt -- Shred It!
|
|
(...) Come-come Richard, the real bad guys here are at Enron. Republicans were only enjoying their hospitality. :) It is great to see how private sector companies feel they can ruin their employee’s pensions... Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My top 10
|
|
(...) I honestly do not see what is wrong with posting a list of personal favorites to a group and thus sharing that list of favorites with others and inviting them to discuss their favorites as well. (...) No, not yours, Dave. I'd rather not name (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My top 10
|
|
(...) We aren't upset at you for this, Jacob. We respect that you have such a list....I have one as well. I choose to post mine on my website rather than leave it out in the open (as you have done) for everyone to scrutinize. (...) I can't disagree (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | America at Work, or When in Doubt -- Shred It!
|
|
Hey Y'all: I predicted some of this last month, was it too obvious? (URL) thanks to all of you that voted republican -- with politicians as honest as these, who needs actual criminals? -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is a "review"?
|
|
(...) It's not relevent because he's not making the comment on other elements, he's making comment on the Jack Stone one. (...) That's right he can form and express opinions in writing. It's when he calls it a "review" that it worries me. (...) But (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is a "review"?
|
|
(...) Allan's familiartity with other lego sets and elements is absolutely relevant, how could it be otherwise? That fact is practically the soul of his reviews. As to his familiarity with Jack Stoned, I'll concede his methods might have been more (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Eastern european peoples/cultures
|
|
Hi there! Can anybody help me on this? I would like to know some facts and figures about Eastern european peoples/cultures, namely from Russia, Ukraine and Moldavia. If anyone has reliable information about living conditions and wages there, please (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Bionicle Parts in LDraw (was: Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf)
|
|
(...) Please keep one thing in mind: the Slizer/Bionicle parts are some of the most ornate, detailed elements LEGO has ever produced. So it's little wonder that they aren't all modeled. But, a number of Throwbot/Slizer/Robo...r/Bionicle parts have (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
(...) Thats just great. Somebody disagrees with you and you tell them to vanish and deman them while asking them to go. Heh, and they still call Lugnet the most friendly place on the net. I used to think it was... -Rich Lugnet member #267 (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
(...) And I'm going to call you... Steve... How's that? :-) Jude (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
Hi Dave! Nice to hear from you :-) See you next month.... "Dave Johann" <legomecha@adelphia.net> wrote in message news:GpLDLH.5BB@lugnet.com... (...) But - does the Brickshelf viewership - at least those who do not like the images - need to be (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
(...) I'm going to call you... GULLIBLE... How's that? Or how about this? HUMORLESS... :\ ---SteveR (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
(...) Lol! You think I am Matthew, LOL, thats funny. Just because I put you in your place I *must* be matthew, lol! Why do you not reply to what I said? Is it because you know I am right? You must know this if you are stooping to calling names. I (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
(...) You said it yourself: 'a near-exact representation of the real thing.' How many people can actually draw 'a near-exact representation of the real thing' even with the help of a painting/drawing program. Very few, and of those that can even (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
(...) Funny, but using the same criteria, I could say I'm tired of all the same, boring castle creations that keep flooding BS. It doesn't mean I'm right, but I could say it. It's all a matter of opinion. -Dave (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | While in Harrisburg... (was: Try for summary of this debate...)
|
|
(...) Larry, while you're here, and if you have a free day, check out the Railroad Museum of PA located in Strasburg, across the street from the Strasburg Railroad. Museum: (URL) Railroad: (URL) fairly easy to get to from Harrisburg (1 hour): Take (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.us.pa.phi.har)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
(...) Replying to myself... This was perhaps an issue best left to an email to Kevin, which I have now sent. My apologies, Kevin, I didn't want to sound negative or cast any bad light on Brickshelf -- I think you're doing a great job! Cheers, - (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
(...) (URL) I think it's discontinued, based on two items: - no longer linked from the front page - my last donation isn't recorded in there ($25 on 2001-09-25) I wonder why it's no longer linked to, has Kevin entered a situation where he no longer (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
"Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@rogers.com> wrote in message news:GpKz04.Jvn@lugnet.com... (...) This was actually my point. I've read Kevin Lochs post and I'm fine with it. Whats good with him is good with me frankly. In retrospect I should have (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
"Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@rogers.com> wrote in message news:GpKz04.Jvn@lugnet.com... (...) :-) Hey sign on AIM, I'm actually back on now. We're all in Bricklug chat. fut - lugnet.people -Tim(my) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
(...) us to bite the hook. The best solution is for all of us to let this go and move on. Obviously we[1] should agree to disagree on on certain issues and move on. Face it the owner of Brickshelf has spoken so the time for debate is over. Don't (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
"tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpKvLE.8u7@lugnet.com... (...) said" Matthew-- I mean Tom. Stop now. Please. I really think its time for you to go back and lurk some more. Or go do whatever it was you did before this thread. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
"tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpKxEH.Epo@lugnet.com... (...) Really, (...) Don't you realize typing in all caps is immature? And maybe I snipped that because I had no argument with it or acknowledged it. Maybe you'll never (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
Noticed you cut every part where I said that I do not think that image belongs on brickshelf, very clever Timmy. But have you realised that I DO NOT THINK ADULT IMAGES BELONG ON BRICKSHELF! Do you understand this? Really, honestly... do you? tom (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
"tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpKwos.Bpt@lugnet.com... (...) Wow, you're very articulate. And smart too, for finding a derivitave of my name. I applaud you. (...) up... I most definitely did not put that image up. After viewing (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
(...) Timmy, shut up! How many times do I have to say adult content is not approiate for brickshelf? Really Timmy, how many times must I say this befor it registers in that thick head of yours?? This is really making me sick. (...) SO DO I TIMMY - I (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Try for summary of this debate...
|
|
(...) I agree 100%, and even if we did have hard data on this, it is not our place to worry about bandwidth, that concern is Kevin's and not ours. Kevin is the one who pays for it, not us - so he should be the one concerned with this. tom (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
And before you go off and say that I misquoted you, (URL) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Reiterating my thoughts on the Avatar issue
|
|
The title of this should be 'Jon trying to change and cleanup what he said" (...) it was a 'I do not like these, so lets get rid of them' post. (taken from your first post on this) "These Avatar images (etc..) seem to pertain to a website called (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
(...) Are you trying to say I did this? If you are saying that I did this please be man enough and say it. I noticed you left out any names on your 'thoughtfull' post. *For the record*, **I did not put any pictres up on brickshelf**, but if your (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Try for summary of this debate...
|
|
(...) I'd like to highlight this a bit more. I think it would be a big mistake to make any value judgements based on popularity contests for what content is allowed. A "highlights" page which brought forth folders or images which are highly rated (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
