Subject:
|
Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:36:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
315 times
|
| |
|
|
"tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpKwos.Bpt@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney writes:
> > > This is uncalled for, and it's certainly not needed on brickshelf. I
> > don't want to hear it justified because "it has bricks!"
> >
> > Though inappropriate, its 'Lego-related content.' I'd be expecting Tom
> > Inosanto to be defending it anytime now.
>
> Timmy, shut up!
Wow, you're very articulate. And smart too, for finding a derivitave of my
name. I applaud you.
> > But, just a little food for thought with the current debate.
>
> whoa, almost sounds like you put it up...... did you? I did not put it
up...
I most definitely did not put that image up. After viewing it from Jon's
post I realized the irony in the current debate and made the association.
Nice try though.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
| Noticed you cut every part where I said that I do not think that image belongs on brickshelf, very clever Timmy. But have you realised that I DO NOT THINK ADULT IMAGES BELONG ON BRICKSHELF! Do you understand this? Really, honestly... do you? tom (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
| (...) Timmy, shut up! How many times do I have to say adult content is not approiate for brickshelf? Really Timmy, how many times must I say this befor it registers in that thick head of yours?? This is really making me sick. (...) SO DO I TIMMY - I (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
