Subject:
|
Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 04:09:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
217 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney writes:
> "Rob Drechsel" <robo2705@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:GpJury.DpI@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > > Well, I think this sums it up:
> > > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=99738
> > >
> > > Didn't take long. And some moron will eventually come along and burn • Jason at
> > > Brickfilms as well (to tie in another debate).
> > >
> > > <sigh>
> > >
> > > -John
> >
> > This is uncalled for, and it's certainly not needed on brickshelf. I • don't
> > want to hear it justified because "it has bricks!"
>
> Though inappropriate, its 'Lego-related content.' I'd be expecting Tom
> Inosanto to be defending it anytime now.
>
> For the record, I think its inappropriate and doesn't belong on Brickshelf.
> But, just a little food for thought with the current debate.
Indeed. And now the twit has removed them. I did, however, download the images
and will be forwarding them to Kevin for his consideration.
-John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
| "Rob Drechsel" <robo2705@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpJury.DpI@lugnet.com... (...) Jason at (...) don't (...) Though inappropriate, its 'Lego-related content.' I'd be expecting Tom Inosanto to be defending it anytime now. For the record, I (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
