Subject:
|
Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 05:57:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
259 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > Well, I think this sums it up:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=99738
> >
> > Didn't take long. And some moron will eventually come along and burn Jason at
> > Brickfilms as well (to tie in another debate).
>
> I think the admins have dealt with it already because I get a blank page.
> Can someone (while remaining within the bounds of gentle speech and the
> LUGNET TOS, please) say what it was? Who or what was it insulting/mocking, etc?
>
> Thanks
It was an image of a totally naked woman with LEGO bricks covering up the
genetalia.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Try for summary of this debate...
|
| (...) (gen*I*talia but who's counting) OK, thanks for that info. I've seen nekkid girls before so I guess I didn't miss much there. But was it anyone we KNOW??? Um, can I suggest that someone summarize the larger discussion and see if it can be put (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
| (...) I think the admins have dealt with it already because I get a blank page. Can someone (while remaining within the bounds of gentle speech and the LUGNET TOS, please) say what it was? Who or what was it insulting/mocking, etc? Thanks (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
