Subject:
|
Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 03:56:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
188 times
|
| |
|
|
"Rob Drechsel" <robo2705@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:GpJury.DpI@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > Well, I think this sums it up:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=99738
> >
> > Didn't take long. And some moron will eventually come along and burn • Jason at
> > Brickfilms as well (to tie in another debate).
> >
> > <sigh>
> >
> > -John
>
> This is uncalled for, and it's certainly not needed on brickshelf. I • don't
> want to hear it justified because "it has bricks!"
Though inappropriate, its 'Lego-related content.' I'd be expecting Tom
Inosanto to be defending it anytime now.
For the record, I think its inappropriate and doesn't belong on Brickshelf.
But, just a little food for thought with the current debate.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
| (...) Timmy, shut up! How many times do I have to say adult content is not approiate for brickshelf? Really Timmy, how many times must I say this befor it registers in that thick head of yours?? This is really making me sick. (...) SO DO I TIMMY - I (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
