Subject:
|
Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:31:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
225 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney writes:
> > This is uncalled for, and it's certainly not needed on brickshelf. I • don't
> > want to hear it justified because "it has bricks!"
>
> Though inappropriate, its 'Lego-related content.' I'd be expecting Tom
> Inosanto to be defending it anytime now.
Timmy, shut up! How many times do I have to say adult content is not
approiate for brickshelf? Really Timmy, how many times must I say this befor
it registers in that thick head of yours?? This is really making me sick.
>
> For the record, I think its inappropriate and doesn't belong on Brickshelf.
SO DO I TIMMY - I AGREE 100% WITH YOU!
> But, just a little food for thought with the current debate.
whoa, almost sounds like you put it up...... did you? I did not put it up...
tom
> -Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
| "tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpKwos.Bpt@lugnet.com... (...) Wow, you're very articulate. And smart too, for finding a derivitave of my name. I applaud you. (...) up... I most definitely did not put that image up. After viewing (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
| "Rob Drechsel" <robo2705@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpJury.DpI@lugnet.com... (...) Jason at (...) don't (...) Though inappropriate, its 'Lego-related content.' I'd be expecting Tom Inosanto to be defending it anytime now. For the record, I (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
