To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 15429
15428  |  15430
Subject: 
Re: My top 10
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 11:53:40 GMT
Viewed: 
2751 times
  
In lugnet.build.mecha, Dave Johann writes:
> In lugnet.build.mecha, Kirby Warden writes:
> > Bryce-
> > 
> > You may participate more in a forum than others, but there is no special
> > recognition or status for doing so.  Further, no one is required to post
> > MOCs just to earn the priviledge of participating in a discussion.
> 
> Where did Bryce once mention that posting MOCs is a requirement for
> participation? I've read his message numerous times now and I don't see
> where he mentions this at all.

I just made a new post where I snipped out the specific issues that I feel
need to be addressed.  Please take a look at it.


> 
> By this logic, I should be able to post in .train and have similar
> status/recognition as Larry P.? I don't think so.

You are correct that you would not have the same status/recognition.  But
that would not prevent you from sharing ideas or opinions.

Posting MOCs of a certain
> type does lend to your credibility as a builder of that type of MOC. The
> more credibility you carry, the more you are 'looked up to' and asked for
> advice more often within that particular building community.

Again, lack of status or recognition should not limit ones participation in
discussions.

I'd prefer to
> ask Lar how to build a train or Shiri a castle then go to Bryce for the same
> advice.

Such is the result of status and/or recognition.  I have given thanks where
it was due on several occasions.

> 
> I'd agree that while no one is required to post MOCs in order to take part
> in a discussion, it certainly doesn't hurt one's credibility to do so.

Here, I have the impression you may have misread me.  My post has nothing to
do with ones *credibility*, that is entirely subjective and open to debate
on a case by case basis.  My point is that people should not have to earn
*any* credibility, status, or recognition just to post an opinion or
participate in an ongoing discussion.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: My top 10
 
(...) I did. You've explained your opinion well in the new post. (...) I never mentioned that it would prevent me from being able to express my ideas or opinions. I merely point out that my credibility isn't the same and therefore wouldn't hold as (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: My top 10
 
(...) Where did Bryce once mention that posting MOCs is a requirement for participation? I've read his message numerous times now and I don't see where he mentions this at all. By this logic, I should be able to post in .train and have similar (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build.mecha)

46 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR