Subject:
|
Re: Indranil
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.market.theory
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Oct 1999 01:50:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
536 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> I have no reason to think that you do not exist. and I don't think you
> need to say who you are or give some background to participate here, if
> you're talking about the brick. Everyone in the world can and should
> enjoy our favorite toy.
Yes, but you kept asking me to identify myself and tell who I was. You thought
one of the people ticked off about bogus feedback was in your midst and you
became instantly defensive.
> you're not talking about the brick. You're attacking me (1) and those of
> us that think that eBay sellers perhaps should not have all the cards in
> their hand or up their sleeve, that buyers deserve a few too. And I just
> like to know what axes my attackers are planning to grind.
I made a reply to your discussion on auctions a few days ago and asked one
simple question. Since then, I have been the one being slammed because no one
has seen my postings here before. Well, a person has to start somewhere. And I
started with the current juicy topic. There has not been much talk of the
"brick" on here for quite a while. So far I have seen a lot of back patting
about the experiment on eBay, I have seen something like the Dating Game for a
high schooler and a lot of people who claim not to like eBay but are still
willing to buy and sell from there.
> If you do a search for my name and ObQualifications, you'll find me
> posting my particular qualifications or perspective at the start of a
> pontificating run (so that the reader knows where I'm coming from) a
> fair number of times. I have nothing to hide.
>
> I think you need to give a little more qualification on what your angle
> is than just a name. None of this thread is about the brick, really.
> It's about eBay.
Well, we ARE posting under Marketplace Theory.
> I repeat, I've run auctions in a number of places. I find auction theory
> interesting and I like to discuss it. My reputation for honesty is
> stellar, my ethics are on the table to be examined and have indeed been
> more closely examined by all and sundry over off-topic.debate than
> anyone else here, I dare say. I welcome feedback on how to better
> accomplish what I am setting out to do on eBay, and I welcome open
> debate on whether it's a good idea or not...
I gave you an idea and you said you liked it. The idea seemed sensible to me
and others but now I am just a "cipher". You labelled my name at the top of
your posting. I know I have an unusual name and it would throw you off. In the
next attack are you going to not only want to know the Lego theme I enjoy
most, but my age, color and origin? Is this a closed discussion group as in
back to the days of civil liberties for some and not others?
>
> oh, and I've made a few minor contributions to the community over the
> years, I think.
>
> While you, you're a cipher who is taking potshots. At least that's my
> perception.
> Now, don't think you've "rattled" me. I don't rattle. I just like to be
> precise.
Calling names certainly means you are rattled.
>
> So, who are you? Have you sold stuff on eBay? Have you bought stuff? Are
> you one of the people we've annoyed? What IS your angle? Stop avoiding
> the question or stop participating. (2)
Stop participating. Is this Lugnet or Larnet? Why do you need to know "who I
am" so badly? Are the discussions on Lugnet always so chock full of paranoia?
>
> 1 - or maybe you're not attacking ME, per se, you're just taking cheap
> shots at a target of opportunity. When one has a swelled head as large
> as mine, it's a big target. :-)
>
> 2 - I can't stop you from posting but I can disregard your input. If you
> just want to take cheap shots that may not bother you much but if you
> are actually trying to say something, come out and say it. You'll never
> effect a change in my behaviour if you can't convince me to change it,
> and you can't convince me unless you have standing. I've got standing.
> Do you?
This is not the place to be a newbie, is it? The King does not like all new
subjects equally, especially if they do not look, sound, act or discuss, or
have names such as he has.
I am bailing on this one. Not because you have offended me, Larry, but because
I do enjoy Legos and I like to spend more time building with Legos than
talking about Legos. There are real Lego maniacs, but most of them are not on
these Lugnet discussions. I'll be on when there is real information to be had,
legos offered for trade and sale, and people who actually build with Legos
rather than hoard them away in their closets. This one really stirred up the
bottom of the barrel at Lugnet. When one starts asking the real difficult
questions and calls it like they see it, it usually happens.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Indranil
|
| (...) If you honestly think that this is the only thing that goes on here, you haven't bothered to read very many discussions. Just in the last two days you've missed postings dealing with trainiacs making a hit at model train shows and someone (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | Re: Indranil
|
| (...) No. It's very open. You're obviously not. Your constant obfuscation is boring me. (...) be (...) It's not name calling, it's a valid observation. You can see quite a lot about us, but we know nothing about you. Tell us about yourself, so we (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
| | | Re: Indranil
|
| (...) Larry? Defensive? We must not be reading the same posts. (...) I don't like the government but I still pay taxes. I don't like pain, but I still go to my physiotherapy. You don't have to like something to use it. Or to want to see it fixed if (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Indranil
|
| (...) I have no reason to think that you do not exist. and I don't think you need to say who you are or give some background to participate here, if you're talking about the brick. Everyone in the world can and should enjoy our favorite toy. But (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
