Subject:
|
Re: My average set
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Dec 2004 05:51:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2162 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, David Drew wrote:
> Come on Richie, you have to give us more information than that. What is
> the metric you use to calculate the average? Set number? Pieces? Age of
> set? For the set re-releases, do you use the old set number, or the new
> set number?
>
> Also, what is your median set number?
>
> David Drew,
> who's average set number is probably high in the 8000's
>
>
>
> Richie Dulin wrote:
>
> > Long time readers of .loc.au (and perhaps a few others) may recall my love of
> > statistics, and my dislike of the use of averages as a reasonable measure of a
> > population.
> >
> > I have therefore calculated the average set in my collection (though, of course,
> > it is no longer intact as a 'set') is:
> >
> > <<LEGOSet(6047)>>
> >
> > Cool huh?
Doesn't have anything to do with the average number of blue pieces in sets ?
pete.w (not a color drone, a statistical drone)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My average set
|
| Come on Richie, you have to give us more information than that. What is the metric you use to calculate the average? Set number? Pieces? Age of set? For the set re-releases, do you use the old set number, or the new set number? Also, what is your (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
