To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 5683
5682  |  5684
Subject: 
Re: More information on LEGO Digital Designer and other things
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad, lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Sat, 3 May 2003 00:07:13 GMT
Viewed: 
39 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Jake McKee writes:
In lugnet.cad, Jake McKee writes:

- "Would LEGO like to see LXF replace LDraw someday? " - Only if you want it
to. For what it's worth, that's where we are putting our energies, and if
you like it then hop on. But if you (you meaning the community) doesn't like
it, then just ignore it and carry on with the LDraw file format. We know LXF
is a new unproven format, and that the LDraw file format has many strengths,
and may continue to have some advantages over LXF. We also know there are
some some shortcomings with the LDraw file format, which is why we are
attempting to create a next generation format. We're not trying to have a
battle of formats, just put our own new internal format out there for others
to use and if you like it, great! If you want to tell us what you don't like
about it or think should be changed, great!

One point of clarification... I meant that we were putting our own efforts
into LXF (not LXF overtaking LDraw). Sorry for any confusion!

Jake
---
Jake McKee
Community Development Manager - N. America
LEGO Direct

Hi Jack,

I appreciate the effort the LEGO company seems to deploy just to please its
adult and child customers. Whatever sparse/complete the part library,
whatever basic/advanced the tools, I am sure the LCAD world will be better
after LXF than before. Anyway, users will use the best for their own usage.
So I expect LDraw and Digital Designer to coexist cooperatively as beeing
the best in any domain is difficult or impossible.

I have a suggestion: could parts releases be on a theme by theme basis
rather than on a parts by parts basis?
The recurrent problem with parts by parts releases is many parts are
actually unused because of missing parts. So the number of actively used
parts is less than the number of available parts.
Wonderfully patient and talented guys (Bernd and Sascha Broich) have
modelled this masterpiece LDraw horse, unfortunately without many concrete
usages because no LDraw knight helmet is currently available.
LDraw has almost no classic castle users just because of this single missing
knight helmet part.
Obviously, strongly themed parts only work together so parts by parts
releases scatter the benefit of new parts between many uncompleted themes.
On the contrary a whole theme release at least adds a new theme.

So theme by theme releases are desirable.
Just a suggestion.

Damien



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More information on LEGO Digital Designer and other things
 
(...) One point of clarification... I meant that we were putting our own efforts into LXF (not LXF overtaking LDraw). Sorry for any confusion! Jake --- Jake McKee Community Development Manager - N. America LEGO Direct (22 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.lego.direct)

29 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR