Subject:
|
Re: Nothing to say?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:17:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2252 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Timothy Gould wrote:
> I'll offer some comments about what I can.
>
> > 8. Weeding through In-fighting at lugnet is a turn off.
>
> I just don't understand this. Most of the in-fighting goes on away from the
> models.
I used to look at recent posts to enjoy the gamut of LugNet. When in-fighting
occured, the "Noise-to-MOC" ratio was 10:1 as everybody angrily came out of the
woodwork.
> > 9. "Constructive/Tactful Criticism" is all too easily taken as flame bait.
>
> I've never noticed this to be a problem and the few times I've seen it occur
> have stuck in my memory. If, however, by "Constructive/Tactful Criticism" you
> mean the sort of review you make on CSF then I'm not at all surprised it's taken
> that way.
Yes, hopefully I can post ideas that won't be taken that way. At least LugNet
posters are more reserved about their comments. CSF has an elitist reputation
with comments like "Why did you waste your and our time with this?"
> > 10. There is no great "MOC Rating" system out there, and Lugnet is not set up to
> > be a "Ratings" site.
>
> If MOCpages is anything to go by they mainly measure the
> popularity of your theme and the ratio of friends to enemies you've made amongst
> the teenagers there.
I too wish for a more objective rating. If only BrickShelf or MocPages had a
search for folders most visited by Month and Year. As it is, we only have
"Greatest Hits" which only becomes self aggrandizement of the past greatest
MOCs.
> > 11. I only vist lugnet for the "Highlights".
> Which basically means you take without giving in exchange.
No, my MOCs are not particularly worthy of giving lugnet. I learned that long
ago. Although my opinions are not as credible as a seasoned veteran like you,
why should that instantly discredit those? I try to post to add to a discussion
which thanks to you has happened.
That is a reason that Lugnet has less MOC responses. Lugnet gets mostly MOC
announcements from Great Builders. Like others, I refrain from cluttering up
forums with one line "Awesome MOC!!!" posts. That is MocPages' job.
Thanks for the discussion,
Andy
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| Hi Andy, Firstly I'd like to say that I think you and I got off on the wrong foot and I'd like to apologise for that. Looking through these comments here I see I misjudged you and I think you misinterpreted my rudely-phrased comment slightly. (...) (...) (18 years ago, 18-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Nothing to say?
|
| I'll offer some comments about what I can. (...) Understandable. I've discussed this elsewhere. (...) I just don't understand this. Most of the in-fighting goes on away from the models. (...) I've never noticed this to be a problem and the few times (...) (18 years ago, 13-Oct-06, to lugnet.general)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
