To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 41267
41266  |  41268
Subject: 
Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 22:17:18 GMT
Viewed: 
89 times
  
In lugnet.mediawatch, Dave Schuler writes:

I expect that many of those investigated have spoken English and have worn
shoes; do either of these facts relate to the crimes of which the
individuals are accused?

Well, CLEARLY wearing footwear does. EVERYONE knows that! (1) See what shoes
did to Imelda Marcos? QED.

1 - Apologies to any "Life of Brian" or "Red Shoe Diaries" fans out there

XFUT o-t.fun... any more SERIOUS replies ought to go to o-t.debate, IMHO.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Shoes (was Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
 
(...) As I recall, there was an old lady who lived in a shoe. (...) What does quantum electrodynamics have to do with it?!? (...) Eek! I thought I'd set FUT ot.debate. Obviously the computer made an error. Dave! (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
 
(...) That's not an unreasonable interpretation, though one needs to be careful to avoid baby-with-the-bathwater reasoning. Brendan can hardly be held accountable for the actions of his audience, just as Martin Scorsese can't be blamed for (...) (22 years ago, 25-Feb-03, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)

39 Messages in This Thread:




















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR