To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 23920
23919  |  23921
Subject: 
Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad, lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:38:14 GMT
Viewed: 
99 times
  
In lugnet.cad, David Schilling writes:
In lugnet.cad, Todd Lehman writes:
In lugnet.cad, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
(*) I think the word "beige" is more apt.  Does anyone really
think the word "tan" is better for this color?

I had always been planning someday to use the word "beige" instead of "tan"
for the tan brick color, until I noticed last week that LEGO calls it "Tan"
in the new Holiday S@H catalog.  Wow.

--Todd

Another reason to call it 'tan' is because that's a lot easier to spell!  :-)

--
David Schilling

Beige is whiter than the "tan" bricks (white bricks do turn "tan" in the sun
though).  Tan, before TLC started making it, was a brownish grey, wasn't it?  I
would like to call the brick colour "sand".



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
 
(...) Another reason to call it 'tan' is because that's a lot easier to spell! :-) -- David Schilling (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general)

41 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR