Subject:
|
Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:24:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1078 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
> > (*) I think the word "beige" is more apt. Does anyone really
> > think the word "tan" is better for this color?
>
> I had always been planning someday to use the word "beige" instead of "tan"
> for the tan brick color, until I noticed last week that LEGO calls it "Tan"
> in the new Holiday S@H catalog. Wow.
>
> --Todd
Another reason to call it 'tan' is because that's a lot easier to spell! :-)
--
David Schilling
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| (...) Beige is whiter than the "tan" bricks (white bricks do turn "tan" in the sun though). Tan, before TLC started making it, was a brownish grey, wasn't it? I would like to call the brick colour "sand". (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| (...) I had always been planning someday to use the word "beige" instead of "tan" for the tan brick color, until I noticed last week that LEGO calls it "Tan" in the new Holiday S@H catalog. Wow. --Todd (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
