Subject:
|
Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 21:45:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1056 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
> > (*) I think the word "beige" is more apt. Does anyone really
> > think the word "tan" is better for this color?
>
> I had always been planning someday to use the word "beige" instead of "tan"
> for the tan brick color, until I noticed last week that LEGO calls it "Tan"
> in the new Holiday S@H catalog. Wow.
I've always thought of that color as "tan". As in "tanned leather". It's
always made sense to me - but then, I'm in Alberta - surrounded by the
cattle market.
I've never considered it beige.
James
James Brown's Parts Sale: http://www.brickbay.com/store.asp?p=jamesb
4000+ parts, averaging $0.10 per piece.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| (...) I had always been planning someday to use the word "beige" instead of "tan" for the tan brick color, until I noticed last week that LEGO calls it "Tan" in the new Holiday S@H catalog. Wow. --Todd (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
