Subject:
|
Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 18:57:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1008 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Charles Eric McCarthy writes:
> (*) I think the word "beige" is more apt. Does anyone really
> think the word "tan" is better for this color?
I had always been planning someday to use the word "beige" instead of "tan"
for the tan brick color, until I noticed last week that LEGO calls it "Tan"
in the new Holiday S@H catalog. Wow.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| (...) I've always thought of that color as "tan". As in "tanned leather". It's always made sense to me - but then, I'm in Alberta - surrounded by the cattle market. I've never considered it beige. James James Brown's Parts Sale: (URL) parts, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Partsref is pure bliss
|
| Thanks very much! My constructive criticisms: (1) The edge lines don't stand out well enough for these colors: Teal - 3 Brown - 6 Turquoise - 11 Purple - 22 and several other colors could also be improved by more contrastive edge lines. (2) The dark (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
