To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 22152
22151  |  22153
Subject: 
Re: Next year
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.town
Date: 
Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:23:56 GMT
Viewed: 
1106 times
  
I think the ELC (Early Learning Centre) find it cheaper to purchase
Megablocks in bulk than Lego, also Lego is expensive compared to
Megablocks - also its a hit with parents on low income.


--
Michael

- - -
Please reply on
medwards@ukonline.co.uk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Home of the UK Lego Technic Club Magazine
                www.technic-uk.co.uk
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

"Farlie A" <alex_farlie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:G0xnw2.DAC@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.general, Tom Stangl writes:
"Mark D. McKean" wrote:

In article <G0stHG.L1t@lugnet.com>, "Kyle Henneberque"
<kaaskop15@hotmail.com> wrote:

I believe the last time there was a library was in 19- oh wait, they
never have.  So, are you trying to say that a real town isn't chock
full of rescue and construction things while being totally devoid of
any houses or retail stores?

As much as I like the idea of a LEGO library, I doubt that they'll ever
release anything like that (or stores or museums or other sedate
structures) outside of Belville. Rescue units and construction units • are
exciting to pre-pubescent boys and offer opportunities for exciting • play
value. Libraries and stores are only good for AFOLs.

Not really - if they want to make inroads to female sales, they need more
buildings.  Girls tend to gravitate towards building more permanent
structures (just read through all the posts here on Lugnet, you'll see • it's
basically true).

And TLC/TLG?Futura needs tomove way from the pale pink/lime green of the
Belville era.
IMO I feel that range was misguided.- Lego(R) has never been Mattel or one • of
any of others of 'fad' US toy manafacturers. Lego(R) in the 1980's early
1990's was a unique postive experience. I think around 1997 it lost it's • way...

Whilst I accept that 'little girls' have different desires from 'little • boys'
I feel that to balntly exenuate the differences was perhaps a • misunderstanding
on the part of the designers.  Pre the recent JR sets, Lego seemed to have
very good female representation( Notably, who got the Bow and arrows in • the
Indigo Islands?).

I will admit that I did by a Pradisa set once(I am male). But that's • because
it intrested me. However Pradisa again fell into the trap of products • aimed
at 'little girls'=pink/lime/paste color scheme and as far as I am aware • did
not sell very well?
(Incidentally, I woudn't mind if they added the Padisa shades to the Bulk
selection. Then perhaps we could all build Miami in Lego(R) ;-))

I also note that The Early Learning Centere (A uk Toy Shop that has
principles) appears to have removed Lego from its shelves. (Does any UK • reader
here know why?). Last time I looked in they had (SHOCK HORROR!) Mega • Blocks
instead.

Alex




--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Next year
 
(...) And TLC/TLG?Futura needs tomove way from the pale pink/lime green of the Belville era. IMO I feel that range was misguided.- Lego(R) has never been Mattel or one of any of others of 'fad' US toy manafacturers. Lego(R) in the 1980's early (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town)

32 Messages in This Thread:













Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR