 | | Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | Why has there been such apathy towards Wamalug's train shows? In the past month, there have been a total of nine messages from non-members about our setups. There has been absolutly no discussion, no critiques, and very little praise. Do you all (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | (...) tons (...) one (...) Well, I care. But then, I suppose I would. Seriously though, you'd get more attention out of some Lugnet readers if you said how great Mega Bloks are. Maybe they are just in awe with the layout. Or maybe they think we (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | (...) Guilty as charged. There are only so many times I feel I can post "wow, looks great, wish I could do that" per week. (...) Never crossed my mind. (...) Well, I for one can see that you guys are artists, and therefore need your egos pumped up (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Kya Morden
|
| | | | | | (...) Generally frowned on as a "no-no" but, ME TOO! ^_^; I think Sproat said it best, you can only post "wow, looks great, wish I could do that" so many times per week. ^_^; (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | (...) ...clearly a new feature needed on the lugnet newswindow... a button to automatically post a 'wow, looks great' message :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wildlink.com lugnet #160 (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | "Wow, looks great!" (was: Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) LOL -- that, and also a "Me Too!" button! :-) Hey, maybe we can patent One-Click Me-Too'ing! ;-) --Todd (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Matthew Teets
|
| | | | | I can understand your frustration. My own view is that anytime you post something it seems to be fairly random as far as the response. I've posted some things that I didn't think were all that important and had 32 e-mail replies and generated a lot (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | Hi Jeff, I must say, I couldn't check out the display earlier. I did now, only a little part (no time, sorry) and it looks very awesome. I don't think everyone is apathetic - just, as Richard said, don't think your egos need stroking... :) After (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | (...) ...Yes they do!!! I'm insecure and all... :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wildlink.com lugnet #160 (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | Jeff, Well, I am looking at the pictures now, I have been severely behind on e-mail, etc. From what I have seen so far, it is awesome, the big crane is mind-blowing. Great job everyone! Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | | I respond to anything that I see and find interesting, but although taking part in another long DCC thread, I don't remember reading any threads about successful DCC. Can you point me to some Lugnet messages or web urls? -- Paul Davidson, aka Tinman (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | (...) Here's a thread in lugnet.trains that you can get your teeth into: (URL) Cook, WAMALUG DCC and table construction master, talks about DCC, and implications from TLC, (which, if they follow their usual pattern, will not be a compatible or (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Not from me. I've just been time and connectivity challenged over the last week. The pics I saw (in the brief moments I've had) are amazing. Sorting layouts into tabletop(everyone else) vs legomodular(GMLTC so far, maybe BAYLUG soon), you guys (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Oh, and another thing. DO NOT do things because you want adulation from Lugnetters... do them because you want to. Did you have fun at the show? Did the people who came have fun? GMLTC labored in obscurity for years (and Conan for years before (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I think we might have been hoping for a longer conversation than the one we got, (not to speak for Jeff, but that's what I think he was saying and I echo'd). No, we aren't in it for the adulation, just the conversation. It is still my (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) You're right on the money here. I do it because it's Fun! I don't even do it for the reaction of the crowds at the show. I get great satisfaction from building and combining my creations with others. The train shows also give the group a goal (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Tony Kilaras
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Did (...) so (...) Really?!?! I thought GMLTC was relatively new. Any pics from the early days? (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) That it was called GMLTC is relatively new, but it has existed for many many years. It started as just Conan and his uncle but when Conan got a job at LIC MOA everyone else that worked there started going over to his house to build, then the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —John Gerlach
|
| | | | | | | | (...) That's OK Larry - you're always there in spirit!! JohnG, GMLTC (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | | | (...) Let's see... This one is obvious: (URL) was this (although it is a unique door-less design): (URL) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think 'definately inspired' is a better term here. :) (...) of the coolest things I ever saw. Unfortunately, I only had 4 technic half-pins w/stud at the time and was also lacking in the train department. I built this one a few months ago, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yep. I was thinking of this one (URL) to: (URL) is on the page: (URL) inspired, not direct copies. No imputation intended. I think it's great. ++Lar (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | | (...) They are quite similar. I modeled mine on a few pics of stations that I saw on some historical site. I wish I had enough black slopes for the roof, it's a little red. Space limitations on the WAMALUG layout didn't allow for a the platform (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —James J. Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | I agree with Larry that we need to becareful not to let the LTCs become a competition among each other. I do believe that by looking at what each club has done keeps others motivated to do more. I'd really hate to see it come down to a one club (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | | | | (...) has (...) to a (...) build (...) I have to disagree a bit here. As a highly competitive person, I work better when I feel that I must compete *against* somebody. Competition really does drive innovation and pushes the envelope further. As long (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —James J. Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | | Maybe I should have stated myself a little differently earlier. I do realize that seeing what others do pushes us all to strive to do better, and I believe that's a very healthy part of completion. I have no issue with that at all. I believe that is (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) that (...) that's a (...) that (...) continually (...) great (...) atmosphere (...) for fear (...) needs (...) like the (...) save some disk space and bandwidth.>> (...) with all that you say but with the amplification on the fear of (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Great posts( was Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | | I hate "me too" posts but what an excellent post. If we ever get to excluding people who love the brick just because they love it in a different way, we've failed. Just because castle isn't my cup of tea doesn't mean I can't hurt my jaw in amazement (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Great posts( was Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | (...) Well in fear of this being another "Me Too" post here goes. I agree with all that has been said here but I thought I would add some NELUG perspective. (...) I would have to agree. Plus I would have to add some of the sculpting done by Eric (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Great posts( was Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) I hope GATS decides to do this, we almost always had a crowd at our table. Greenberg is also very interested in getting more LEGO layouts into their shows. (...) I am amazed at our amazing start as well, we came a long way since August. Here's (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Good enough???? Ok Mega-Bloc Man, wait to the next meeting... :) -Chris (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) think (...) it's (...) OOOPPPSSS! (backpeddle backpeddle, duck, duck,) Errr, what I meant was, that just because you might have limited pieces, or you have an excess of unusual pieces, you can still do something very interesting with them, an (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) better :) although i wouldn't refer to Paradisa as unusual... building train structures in pink- that's unusual. :) -chris (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) You reall don't want me to make that a reality do you? There is in existance the Citrus Express. I could whip something up..... HHHMMMM... Mega Blok man eh..... Rich -- Have Fun! C-Ya! Legoman34 ***** Legoman34 (Richard W. Schamus)... (No, I (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Then you must have missed all of the chiding tossed the 8 wide way;-) All seriousness aside, I don't think anyone has any ill-thoughts or intentions to anyone in .trains. Perhaps some of the kidding and smack-talking might *appear* malicious (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Gary R. Istok
|
| | | | | | (...) Wow Mike, you really have set the "bar" higher as to your LEGO aspirations. Going against Conan. Wow, that would take some doing. The way I would suggest competing, is with "quality over quantity" (my own philosophy). But it doesn't hurt to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | | | | Gary Istok <gistok@umich.edu> wrote in message news:38C3CEAB.647015...ich.edu... (...) aspirations. Going (...) doesn't (...) Mr. I have more classic windows than the rest of Lugnet combined talking about not going for quantity? Your collection (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | Excellent approach. It's standard MR technique to get enough of the layout running (even unscenicked) to keep your own interest high. THEN go crazy on superdetailing one area. (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | | | Actually, I had numerous questions about the DCC setup, but I saw in a post that some information was going to be posted about it, so I held my questions until it was posted, but here goes: How much labor (time) is required to convert a Lego Train (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | | | (...) Great Idea! Does anyone know of an open source mpeg/quicktime library to grab the images with? KL (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | Hi Mike, (...) We had five trains and six(maybe seven) moters running on the layout without any significant problems. Our DCC system could only support five addresses. (...) My GP-35 had two moters attached to it, both assigned to the same address. (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Tom Cook
|
| | | | | | | I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technical we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Could you imagine the mess ten trains would have made? :) It was bad enough with three trains, four trains was crazy, and five was plain insane. We had some spectacular crashes, the scariest of which was Rich's shunter doing a full-speed (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | | | | On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 17:14:33 GMT Christopher Tracey <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote concerning 'Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)': (...) I guess it's my job to take responsability for that one - I was driving the shunter (I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) ...The 'other 5' could be set to 'fixed speeds' while we played with the first 5. I had the best luck controlling two trains on one loop when I left one at a fixed speed and controlled the other as needed (course, helps if u pay attention :-) (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | | | | (...) What Chris didn't see was the initial look of horror on my face, after not being there all day, stuck at work, thinking of nothing all day but being there to help tear down and collect my pieces, only to see one of my better creations lately (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | | | (...) ...Lol! yes, u got there just before another problem with DCC happened. The shunter was driving a small cargo train and rear ended a stationary train rite on a curve. The shunter and a number of cars took a tumble and the shunter ended up in a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Tom Cook
|
| | | | | | I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technically we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | OK, now where's that website with all the info on how to build it? ;-) I hope you do a "DCC for Dummies", an EE I am NOT. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | (...) (URL) instructions seem strait forward enuf... tho I'm still a bit nervous about soldering near a LEGO motor... Im trying to convince Tom to make a business out of this 'for a nominal fee' :-) (...) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —James Powell
|
| | | | | | (...) hope (...) I'd be willing to do the mechanical changes. My suggestion would be to get some Indium based solder rather than even 60-40. I use some made by Carrs in the UK, and have no problems with it...the flux is hydrofloric acid though...so (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —John Matthews
|
| | | | | The pix are great, thanks for sharing! I especially liked the little movies, that is the coolest. Your setup makes my measly little train (which I worked on all weekend) look pitiful. Keep sharing pictures with us, we really like them! (especially (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | | | | (...) ...Most of my stuff is kind of pitiful too... but its amazing what a whole bunch of little things from different people piled together can get to. Just a building here, a train car there... an idea for placing some random minifigs... ...Like (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Charles Eric McCarthy
|
| | | | | (...) Well, I'm not one of those who asked about DCC, but I think your show was great. I appreciate your posts, and I really enjoyed the pictures. Excellent job, people! I don't usually post praise about shows, and there are many others like me in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Brad Hamilton
|
| | | | | Well, by now you know that people DO care. I personally have been following all the posts from your show and found the pictures quite enjoyable. However, I didn't have anything particularly interesting to say, so I didn't post anything. I've found (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | (...) well, I, for one, hate counters. Besides, I have the statistics from the web server, and I know that there were almost 1000 hits just to the index page. I know people are watching and from what I can tell likeing our layout. I think Jeff was (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Brad Hamilton
|
| | | | | | Dan Boger <dan@giccs.georgetown.edu> wrote in message news:Fqrx5n.4rK@lugnet.com... (...) Hmm - I like to watch the counter going up on the fly. My web provider only gives statistics after a 24hr period. Perhaps I'm just strange. Besides, I have (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | (...) no, that's perfectly normal - I like to see it too. I just have the advantage of running the server my page is on, so I can access the stats any time. :) Dan (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Greg Crisp
|
| | | | | I for one really enjoyed your setup. I especially enjoyed Dan's pics. However, did not post a response because: - I try not to do "me to" posts - Although I am slowly getting interested, I haven't yet gone over the edge and actually purchased a Lego (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Masi
|
| | | | | Huh? This is about the strangest post I have ever seen. Looking at the last post about WAMALUG there are 15 replies (certainly some of those people aren't WAMALUG members. Sometimes people have alot going on and do not post right away. Further, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | (...) Chris, I looked at your SD40-2 last week shortly after you announced it. I was busy at the time and couldn't write any comments. By the time I had the time to write comments, I couldn't view your page(1) and most everything I wanted to say (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | (...) tons (...) one (...) Woah there. Just because there is no discussion about an event doesn't mean that people don't care, or are not impressed. There are many, many reasons why there might not be discussion about something. People might have (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) Can't speak for anyone else but here's why I hardly ever comment on them. A) I'm not a trainhead B) I normally look at all the pics, and even call my wife in to see them, and amazed at how cool they are, but really have very little to offer in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Tony Kilaras
|
| | | | | Jeff Stembel wrote in message ... (...) little (...) enough (...) tons (...) one (...) I was suitably impressed, but I hardly ever post congratulations. Dunno why. I would hope you do the shows for personal satisfaction and social interaction and (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!) —Nico Hoogerbrug
|
| | | | Hi Jeff, Thats the trouble with the Internet, your doiing it all for yourself, expect no comment, there still a lot of vieuwers or would you rather call them consumers ? Were trying to get the same thing started in Europe, how do you organise such a (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | |
