To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 15785
15784  |  15786
Subject: 
Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug
Date: 
Thu, 2 Mar 2000 14:36:08 GMT
Viewed: 
4144 times
  
Hi Mike,


Mike Poindexter wrote:
> How many different trains can be run before addressing and/or power drain
> problems occur?

We had five trains and six(maybe seven) moters running on the layout
without
any significant problems.  Our DCC system could only support five
addresses.

> How are multiple motors on one loco (or 2 DCC enabled locos on one train)
> handled?  Do they share the same address (not sure if that is the proper
> term) or is it even possible?

My GP-35 had two moters attached to it, both assigned to the same address.
One of the metroliners had two seperate engines assigned the same address.

> Can you change that address easily (to allow 2 or more motors to accept the
> same commands)?

Yes, we have a 'setup track' where we assign address to engines.  This
requires
all trains in the system to be stopped.  Tom can explain this in more
detail.

> Is there the option to send a DCC command to turn on the power plate section
> of the motor to operate other things, like moving people or rotate a
> searchlight?

yes, all of lighted engines were set up this way.

> I actually haven't had much time to look at the pictures of the Wamalug
> set-up.  I have only gone through about half of them.


We are a little over-zealous on our photography aren't we :)

-chris



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
 
I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technical we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (27 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
  Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
 
I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technically we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (27 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
 
Actually, I had numerous questions about the DCC setup, but I saw in a post that some information was going to be posted about it, so I held my questions until it was posted, but here goes: How much labor (time) is required to convert a Lego Train (...) (27 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)

65 Messages in This Thread:




























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR