General Discussion : 10050


General / 10050	10049 \| 10051

Subject:	Age range 16+ (was: Re: 2000 Scans are Online!)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars
Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 1999 22:20:44 GMT
Viewed:	1145 times

In lugnet.general, "Simon Robinson" <simon@simonrobinson.com> writes: > In lugnet.general, Damian Garcia writes: > > Jason Brown wrote in message <382739DC.77E70887@mines.edu>... > > Did you notice the age on the "Ultimate Collector's Series" from 16 years? > > Has Lego listed an age 16 or above? They look expensive to me... > > That does sound like really good news - I assume these are pretty > much the first Lego sets for which the suggested age range is basically > an adult range. > > What puzzles me though is *why* they are marked as from 16. They don't > look especially hard to build - certainly no more so than sets like > the technics space shutttle, which was sold as being for I think about > age 11. My guess, FWIW, is that TLC is still reticent to admit that the products they sell actually appeal to very, very wide age ranges. IOW, if they'd marked it "from 11 years," then they'd be admitting that what 11-year-olds play with is also what adults play with. Starting it at 16 instead of 11 lets them maintain the overall age-range illusion, because, for example, the difference between an 11YO and a 22YO is much, much larger than the difference between a 16YO and a 32YO. And they can't say anything like "ages 11-16" for something this expensive... --Todd (drooling over the hopeful thought of a 7198 Millennium Falcon in the "Ultimate Collectors Series" in 2001 or 2002...?)

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: Age range 16+ (was: Re: 2000 Scans are Online!)
(...) I definitly think the new "Ultimate Collectors Series" sets are marketed almost directly to adults. For one, looking at all the pieces in these models my guess is that these models are probably going to go for $100+ each. I hope I am wrong (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)

		Re: Age range 16+ (was: Re: 2000 Scans are Online!)
(...) My guess is that it has something to do with how they expect the set to be used: this probably isn't the kind of model a young kid can 'whoosh' around a lot with in the living room - it's pretty clear they're thinking this is going to be (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)

		Re: Age range 16+ (was: Re: 2000 Scans are Online!)
(...) You might be on to something, there. But it could also be that the sets are rated 16+ because TLG didn't want to say "These sets are for adults". It seems obvious the display stands and placards are there to appeal to older builders, to make (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
(...) That does sound like really good news - I assume these are pretty much the first Lego sets for which the suggested age range is basically an adult range. What puzzles me though is why they are marked as from 16. They don't look especially (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)

53 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search