Subject:
|
Re: Animation using Datsville
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Mar 2004 05:19:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2324 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.ray, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> Sorry, LDBoxer does not "unpack" and re-parse MPDs. Therefor, the output will
> not be trustworthy. Someday I may be able to make programs that can handle MPDs
> correctly... :/
It worked fine for me. But then, I had to split it up into sections, just like
Orion did.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
| (...) It's not exactly surprising that it worked ok, but if he didn't include any MPD support, then the results aren't necessarily correct. Since he presumably only pays attention to the locations of parts that he's willing to box, the references to (...) (21 years ago, 6-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
| (...) Sorry, LDBoxer does not "unpack" and re-parse MPDs. Therefor, the output will not be trustworthy. Someday I may be able to make programs that can handle MPDs correctly... :/ (...) I can understand that. The entire Town.ldr is an extreme task. (...) (21 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
