Subject:
|
Re: Animation using Datsville
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:03:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2122 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.ray, Michael Horvath wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.ray, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > Yes there are. If you want to render Datsville in it's entirety, unless you
> > have lots of RAM and a big block of virtual memory allocated, the rendering will
> > fail due to lack of memory. But I cheated and used only one "block" of
> > Datsville (town0-1.ldr), not the whole thing.
> >
> > -Orion
>
> Have you tried using LDBoxer to cut down on size?
Yes, I just did this yesterday. I'm now able to render Datsville using qual > 0
but without studs. I'f I turn studs on, POV-Ray fails with an out of memory
error. This happens at about 2 GB of memory used. Even with my page file
jacked up to 3 GB, it still fails. I just found out about a technique that may
allow me to render with studs but it'll be very time consuming to format the POV
file for this. I'll keep everyone posted.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Animation using Datsville
|
| There was some discussion a while back about a technique whereby one culls all objects that are not within the field of view. I don't know if this technique was ever created. I don't know if it's possible to get the bounding box of every object, but (...) (21 years ago, 5-Mar-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
