To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1773
1772  |  1774
Subject: 
Re: MLCading (Was Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:20:59 GMT
Viewed: 
395 times
  
"Ahui Herrera" <jedi_agh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Gr4EvA.L7t@lugnet.com...
I'm going to be Tim C. Jr. here and say it... MLCading?

LOL :-)

I thank you for coming to my defense.  Yes, the two dragons are different. • In
fact, they are very different when you have them up close.  However I will
admit that from a distance, as they are in the pictures I sent in for MOTM,
they do appear very close to being the same.  I'm actually planning on
MLCading all four of my dragons for permanent future reference, and if there
are no objections submitting them for the MOTM.

Anthony, don't you mean you are going to "LDraw" all four of your dragons.
Yes, I'm a newly converted LDraw System of Tools person.  I think we should
start using the proper namings when refering to the LDRAW tools.  Sure we
can say MLCading but if we (the LUGNET community) can't get our names
straight how do we ever expect the media and rest of the world NOT to
confuse MLCad and LDraw...

Just being a nit-picker. =)

Well, Ahui, I wasn't going to say anything here.  But definitely glad I have a
loyal convert to back me up ;-)

I hope the wording I am using on the site, combined with the occasional polite
assertion here make a difference over time.  But, its people who are going to
have to embrace the preferred terminology, and that'll take time.  Just like
.DAT and .LDR.

This is fodder for the BricksWest LDraw Community Roundtable ;-)

I do agree with Tim that some sort of change IS needed with the contest.  I
like what I have read so far and the last comment about multiple division
would probably be best serverd:

1) Past Winner Entries  (Models & Scences)
2) 1st Timers (Models & Scences)
3) Not a first time but not a winner (Models & Scenes)

I'm thinking that dividing the contest this way would be the only appropriate
way to handle the multiple winner situation.  Jacob and Fredrik made valid
points against limiting past winners.

This will give those newbies a even playing field.  Also I'm not sure about
all of you but this month's scenes were again mostly 'space themes' in the
scene entries.  Granted they are very very good (I spent and hour trying to
narrow it down) but can't we start rendering something else?  Space is nice
with all the starts and effect but I challenge our renders to create
something different.

Didn't you know LDraw.org is by nature space-biased?  We have me, a Space nut,
Steve, a Space nut, Terry, a Space nut, and Jacob, well, he does all themes, but
still does some space. :-)

All in good fun, but...

Actually, its a good thing to embrace a variety of themes on the site - but,
unless we break up the contests into theme categories, it will be balanced
towards what theme gets the most entries.  And we don't have the volume of
monthy entries (yet, I hope) to warrant themed divisions.

I love Cale Leiphart's Castle submissions too.  Excellent lighting effects and
framing on the latest 'Fight' scene he sent in.

-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  MLCading (Was Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002)
 
I'm going to be Tim C. Jr. here and say it... MLCading? (...) Anthony, don't you mean you are going to "LDraw" all four of your dragons. Yes, I'm a newly converted LDraw System of Tools person. I think we should start using the proper namings when (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

18 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR