Subject:
|
Re: ldraw.org MOTM & SOTM Winners for January 2002
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:02:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
434 times
|
| |
|
|
"Anthony Sava" <savatheaggie@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Gr3v12.GG8@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Terry Keller writes:
> > Well... I think Anthony Sava's two dragons are different. Similar, but
> > different. And Cale Leiphart's entries are quite different. Somewhat
> > similar in theme, but only broadly. You could also cite Brad Hamilton's
> > multiple wins in architecture.
Yep, Brad was another example I was thinking of, but forgot to mention it. He
does some absolutely incredible stuff no doubt!! I'm just wondering if it is
appropriate or not to allow multiple entries of the same theme of the same
person, for the sake of giving others a chance at having their models showcased.
> I thank you for coming to my defense. Yes, the two dragons are different. In
> fact, they are very different when you have them up close. However I will
> admit that from a distance, as they are in the pictures I sent in for MOTM,
> they do appear very close to being the same. I'm actually planning on • MLCading
> all four of my dragons for permanent future reference, and if there are no
> objections submitting them for the MOTM.
All I'm doing is trying to look for some more variety in the winners, and let
people who haven't won get a better chance of winning.
Not lashing out against your dragon in any sense :-) I just see it as an
example of something, as you put it, the two look very similar.
> > > I think there should be some sort of limit in place, but what should it be?
> > > Should it be based on individuals, individuals AND themes, or what?
> >
> > I really abhor the idea of setting limits. But I do see your point.
>
> As do I. I guess saying I built the red dragon from scratch doesn't help
> things any.
The dragons are great MOCs, I just hope you see my point about variety. What is
your suggestion to give the contests more variety, and to allow people who
haven't won a chance?
> Yes, unfortunately the Cool Lego Website of the Week turned into that. Tamyra
> Teed was almost up in arms that my website, after winning the CSOTW, could not
> be up for voting again like some others (Ed Boxer's for example). I • understand
> the idea of limits, but as she would point out, my website had changed
> dramatically. I won the CSOTW before I had built my large castle, tower,
> atoll, airship, four really big dragons, and a story that for now sits at 24
> chapters long. The story when I won CSOTW was A chapter and it wasn't even • the
> first one.
I don't recall that conversation. But, from what you've said here, it only
seems fair if someone else was put up again after dramatic changes, you should
be given the chance to as well.
> I submit... what if I had won MOTM with a small cottage MOC (MOTM not SOTM • just
> for reference) and a few months later, after much practice and improvement was
> able to create one of my dragons in MLCad? I think I would have been quite • put
> off in that situation, unable to show off my new prowess. I know, however,
> that IRL this is not the case with me, as I went right off the bat with the
> dragons, so you don't have to flame me about it.
Not flaming you at all. I only cited you as one example among several.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
