 | | Re: LDRAW Viewer 0.4 problem and more
|
|
(...) OK, up to now I have been working with very small models, but last night I decided to add some track under one of my engines (I am into trains if you didn't know). Selecting bricks on a large model (ca. 800 bricks) is slow (very slow). So, (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW Viewer 0.4 problem and more
|
|
(...) Actually I never reported this bug, only just experienced it too. Keep poking... On other news my Cocoa version is now displaying models on the screen - I spent 4 days with frustrating crashes. Are there any more issues with verision 0.4 that (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) OK... this is why I am confused about the new feature... doesn't it already exist in LDGLite? I ran the command line above with LDGLiteOSX 0.9.5f (I think it is 0.9.5f, anyway the get info says created Jun 22, 2002) and the "bitmap" folder (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) I'd have to look at the code again, but there's no reason why it couldn't deal with anything :) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
Hi Dwayne - (...) No reason that I see, in fact, it just hasn't happened yet :-) (...) Yup. (...) Absolutely. (...) It's funny how with this post you've hit the nail on the head with my current line of thinking. :-) Steve and I have been talking (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
(...) Ok, got an even more general question. Any reason that a group, could be set aside to develop just the CAD engine, and allow it to be used for loads of things? I mean, the core engine programmers could develop the core parts of the program, (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) HTML can handle anything. So can HTTP, but of the characters listed above, I think it is only '-' and '_' which don't need special treatment. The next level of problems is that the parts tracker is implemented in Perl and running on a Unix (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: lsynth - LDRAW compatible bendable part synthesizer available
|
|
Hi Kevin! I cannot seem to get LSynth to work. The only thing it generates is the same file as the input file... What do I do wrong? Jaco (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) No problem. So what about the offscreen rendering? Does it work? (URL) render offscreen you use -MS on the ldglite command line, eg. ldglite -v3 -l3 -i1 -MS mymodel.mpd (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) Went there, downloaded it, followed the directions to compile it, followed the directions to install it, launched LDGLite in LEDIT mode, and it works as advertised. LDGLite accepts keyboard input now. Next question is, when will Apple (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
"Anders Isaksson" <isaksson.etuna@REMO...tninet.se> skrev i meddelandet news:H8CzME.6py@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) of (...) not (...) After seeing your .dat files, I'll repeat myself, those stones are *very* like the Anchor Stones, they even use (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) I wondered if that's what you meant. Anyhow, the GLUT fix is now available at: (URL) according to fix number 13, it should now accept keyboard input. You'll have to let us know how well it works. It also looks like fix number 3 could benefit (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) I suspect that you are right. I think I that LDGLIte reported GL_Version 1.1 when I was using LDGLite on 10.1.x. I go search the Mac news groups to get more infor GL_VERSION = 1.1 APPLE-1.1 (...) Oops, three missing letters can change the (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) I'm not sure if the framework number is the same as the OpenGL version number. However I think ldglite prints the opengl version number when run from a command prompt so you could check it that way. Maybe it only installs the new OpenGL if you (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) Hmm. When I run Apple System Profiler I get the following entries AGL.framework 2.2.7 18 Dec 2002 01:23 AM OpenGL Carbon compatibility dylib for Mac OS X GLUT.framework 2.2.7 18 Dec 2002 01:29 AM GLUT dylib for Mac OS X OpenGL.framework 1.2.1 (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW Viewer 0.4 problem
|
|
(...) Did I overlook a known bug list? If I did I'll read through it before reporting any other problems. I am not trying to be pushy, I am just offereing the only service that I can offer, guinea pig :) Keep building and I'll keep poking. Chris (22 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
eads up, (...) it in a few hours, Dwayne (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
<snip> (...) Clone brands, seem to be growing in popularity, good or bad, it _should_ be good for even the purists, as it should drive down cost for the Lego Brand. Nothing I am going to complain about... LDraw means I no longer have to let the kids (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
(...) You keep saying that, but I think thou dost protest too much. I'll bet you're right now sitting on a huge stash of TYCO, Byggis, Qubo, Coko, Tandem, and of course MegaBloks. Stop living the lie, Tim! Admit your clonophilia and liberate (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
(...) I agree. While personally, I frown on clone brands, I like the idea of developing libraries for non-LEGO based building systems like K'Nex and Hirstarts. I just browsed the Hirst site, and that stuff is wonderful! If I remember correctly, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
