To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / *5547 (-40)
  Re: New Haute Couture Spring/Summer 2004 Collection
 
(...) [SNIP-SNAP] (...) hi mark, (...) many thx :-) (...) ... and subfile the torso without shells + trim the digits. you are right on this and I totally agree with you on the filesize but the parts are custom ones and will never ever make it to the (...) (20 years ago, 29-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: 6-stud road baseplates with dark grey road pattern parts
 
As I'm almost in a position to upload these 3 road plates to the parts tracker I have a few questions 1) what are the correct part numbers? 44336p01/44342p01/44341p01 or some other identifier to indicate a patterned part? (There is another variant (...) (20 years ago, 29-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: New Haute Couture Spring/Summer 2004 Collection
 
(...) A very unique idea, quite interesting! I would suggest splitting the file in half though and then making it a subpart so that the left side mirrors the right. This would have the nice benefit of reducing file size by nearly 50% (20 years ago, 29-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  New Haute Couture Spring/Summer 2004 Collection
 
Dear Ladys, Holly Wood, your favorite fashion designer, proudly presents its new female runway spring/summer collection 2004. (URL) As usual we have put our attention to a clean line, exclusive fabrics, exceptional attention to detail and a subtle (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: 4773 - Electric Light & Sound Colored Globe
 
Now submitted to the parts tracker (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Advise on Flex tubing and Pneumatic hoses
 
I have been making the custom length flex tubing (using 75.dat and 76.dat) for a while, I normally crate the length I want save it for future use as, for exampl 75_12.dat and import it into my model as a subpart to allow for use of the .mpd on other (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Review notes on wheels x242.dat
 
hi Niels, about my comment on part x242: it is not significant, i will review the part again and "certify" it if no problem found. about my hold vote on part x242c01: i apologize, eventual change of the axle color is an admin concern, thus my hold (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Snatch it?
 
(...) thx for uploading, w. (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: Review notes on wheels x242.dat
 
(...) I have wheels of that type with both silver and gold (brass) axles. Should we have another part with gold axle colour? ROSCO (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Review notes on wheels x242.dat
 
Since I can't reply on the PT to review notes, I'll reply here. First of all, about part x242 "~Wheel Spoked for Metal Pin" (...) What exactly do you mean? I based the axle hole of this wheel mostly on the existing wheel 7039.dat since both wheels (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Snatch it?
 
(...) I missed the doors. I've now uploaded 30073, 30073p01, 30073p02, 30074p01, and 30074p02. I'm sure it won't take long for someone to make s30073s01, put the one stud (to rule them all) in each file, and BFC the lot. Steve (20 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: Snatch it?
 
(...) The files have been posted to the PT. I uploaded 5 parts, 1 sticker-part, and a couple of subfiles. I did not upload GONTA's version of 4696.dat, although it 'looks better' than Marc Klein's -- I don't have a real example of that part handy, (...) (20 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: Snatch it?
 
(...) use his parts then you'll have to rework them for PT complience and then (...) giving credit to the original author. (...) here we go: gonta Scrive: (...) (URL) and proxy to the PT. anybody volunteering to fix them? w. (20 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: 4773 - Electric Light & Sound Colored Globe
 
(...) well not exactly a newbie ... check out part 2552.dat (20 years ago, 17-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: 4773 - Electric Light & Sound Colored Globe
 
(...) (URL) submit parts, you must be an authorized as an author on the PT. If you have parts to submit, register with Ldraw.org and then email Steve Bliss and Chris Dee (parts@ldrawSTOPSPAM.org) letting us know your Ldraw.org username." Hurray! a (...) (20 years ago, 17-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: 4773 - Electric Light & Sound Colored Globe
 
(...) "Sorry, your userid must have submit privileges in order to submit files" (20 years ago, 17-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: 4773 - Electric Light & Sound Colored Globe
 
(...) hi william, the globe is currently at the PT (renamend and hold voted): (URL) submit your version there as well. regarding the renumber please read the comment in: (URL) (...) it might a good idea to add this comment to the globe as well. w. (20 years ago, 17-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  4773 - Electric Light & Sound Colored Globe  [DAT]
 
While creating some models that use this part as a non bulb covering, I've noticed two problems with it 1) the dome top is too squashed - while not a perfect sphere it is not as flat as the current part 2) the part is too short - the real one is (...) (20 years ago, 17-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Unknown Part - Help please
 
I don't know the part number, but one of the hollow studs appears twice. (20 years ago, 17-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Unknown Part - Help please  [DAT]
 
Here's a part from the Pat Pend era I found in an old LEGO lot newly purchased. It is black and there are traces from a blue part glued on top of it. Any information would be appreciated. 0 Unknown Part 0 Name: unknown.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 (...) (20 years ago, 17-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Snatch it?
 
(...) HURRAY!!! I made it through gonta's board and got in touch with him. stay tuned. w. www.holly-wood.it (20 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
 
(...) How about not. s\3626bs00.dat exists for a specific purpose, and I don't think this is a good reason to hijack the file. Steve (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
 
(...) I would definitely like to do this, because the resulting heads look much better, IMO. (see (URL) Through the magic of perl, I've already modified many of the heads on my computer. (...) Hopefully it's the ball joint that's sized wrong, (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
 
(...) I count about 49 heads. That's based on an out-of-date directory on my hard drive, there may be a few more by now. That's a lot of parts to update all in one go. We've done it before, or at least nearly; we redesigned the neck-mark on minifig (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin  [DAT]
 
While I was reviewing this part; "Minifig Head with Standard Grin Pattern" (URL) came across this note; "The (sub)part is still missing most of the horizontal conditional edges. Could torus primitives be used?" My answer would be, "sure why not..." (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: CMDLINE (Issues on Parts Tracker)
 
(...) I have always liked CMDLINE followed by a default colour, and I have the feeling that I am one of those who have used it most times. I also think it really is a pity that it hasn't been used by any [online] catalog or other partlisters (that I (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: CMDLINE (Issues on Parts Tracker)
 
I like using the CMDLINE as a concise way of documenting the default (i.e., the *usual*, not necessarily the *only*) color of a part. The CMDLINE is usually shorter than the corresponding sentence. For example, for the Minifig Flame, I'd rather see (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
 
(...) Yes of course, because all Lego plastic-parts are expected to be virtual available. But these parts are complex and not everybody has them in his/her collection. So part-authors for such parts are welcome. Znap and other not so much liked (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
 
(...) Yes, if they are genuine Lego parts then of course they would be accepted. The limiting factor would be reviewers with enough familiarity with the parts to certify them. Chris (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
 
(...) I think it would depend mostly on how well they're designed. The images you cited look more like gamer graphics (rough 3D geometrics covered with "skins" to fill in all of the more specific details), but LDraw is more about fully-functional (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
 
(...) Well I can't really answer that but I can't think of any reason why they wouldn't be. I would love for someone to create ldraw files for some of the parts in the Bohrok line so I can finally make instructions for my (URL) destroyer droid>. J (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) The CMDLINE meta-statement was originally created to give us some way of giving rendering suggestions to programs that use the parts library. For instance, it was thought that we could specify a 180deg rotation for all those panel parts (like (...) (20 years ago, 13-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Snatch it?
 
(...) Did you try posting on Gonta's board/forum? Steve (20 years ago, 13-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
 
I've gotten a couple of replies from people who might work on some Bionicle parts if they didn't think they'd be wasting their time or duplicating efforts. Here's a question : Would bionicle parts be allowed on the ldraw.org parts tracker ? (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: New part: Train Wheel Old with 4 Studs and Traction Teeth
 
Oops, I noticed one miscalculation. The front of this wheel is not at -10.5 but at -12. Niels (20 years ago, 13-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  New part: Train Wheel Old with 4 Studs and Traction Teeth  [DAT]
 
I have created another old part. It requires one new primitive: 4-4con41 (included below) 0 Train Wheel Old with 4 Studs and Traction Teeth 0 Name: Untitled 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 (...) (20 years ago, 13-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) Just a note: in this situation (which apparently is not actually the situation), this file should have used a tilde (~), not an underscore. Underscores are for "official part shortcuts", which are relatively rare creatures. Steve (20 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) I've never used "CMDLINE -c" except under protest, and dislike its inherent obsolesence. One could argue that almost EVERY part occurs in only one colour the first time it is produced. As soon as the second colour is produced the dat file is (...) (20 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) This is always a good argument against removing any syntax. But see below. (...) As is this one. But see below. (...) Not a large number in the scheme of things really. IF the change is done to parts as they are changed anyway... I guess what (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
 
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) I would say that it's a good thing to leave them in. 2 reasons for this: - Once developers decide they want to support it, the implementation is aleady there. - To remove them would force all the parts that have the command to go thruogh PT (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 40 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR