To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5172
5171  |  5173
Subject: 
Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:44:16 GMT
Viewed: 
2090 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Orion Pobursky wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

Could we have a review/explanation of the use of CMDLINE again? (or a pointer to
documentation). While I support not making unnecessary changes, I'm not sure I
understand if this one is necessary or not.

Basically the CMDLINE staement specifies a default color for the part.  This is
useful if the part only came in one color.  I far as I know, no LDraw programs
actually use this Meta command.

Thanks.

What would the downside be of, over time, as parts go through review and renewal
anyway, gradually discontinuing the use of this command?

I would say that it's a good thing to leave them in.  2 reasons for this:
- Once developers decide they want to support it, the implementation is aleady
there.
- To remove them would force all the parts that have the command to go thruogh
PT recertification.

It is not a large number of parts that use this anyway, right?

A short search gave back 179 files.

-Orion



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) This is always a good argument against removing any syntax. But see below. (...) As is this one. But see below. (...) Not a large number in the scheme of things really. IF the change is done to parts as they are changed anyway... I guess what (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) Thanks. What would the downside be of, over time, as parts go through review and renewal anyway, gradually discontinuing the use of this command? It is not a large number of parts that use this anyway, right? ++Lar (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

18 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR