To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 5169
5168  |  5170
Subject: 
Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:48:16 GMT
Viewed: 
1974 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Andrew Westrate wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee wrote:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Thomas Garrison wrote:
Part 59
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/59.dat
has a CMDLINE statement, even though it has appeared in two different
colors.


I was not aware that this has appeared in Gold. I'll delete the CMDLINE.

Chris

I personally think it would be worth leaving this as-is, because this part
originally appeared in the 2002-03 parts update, but the gold version didn't
come out until 2003.  I wouldn't want to have to delete cmdline statements from
official parts whenever TLC releases a part in a different color.

Plus, there's about three dozen sets that have this in silver, but only one that
has it in gold.

Could we have a review/explanation of the use of CMDLINE again? (or a pointer to
documentation). While I support not making unnecessary changes, I'm not sure I
understand if this one is necessary or not.

Basically the CMDLINE staement specifies a default color for the part.  This is
useful if the part only came in one color.  I far as I know, no LDraw programs
actually use this Meta command.

-Orion



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) Thanks. What would the downside be of, over time, as parts go through review and renewal anyway, gradually discontinuing the use of this command? It is not a large number of parts that use this anyway, right? ++Lar (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
 
(...) Could we have a review/explanation of the use of CMDLINE again? (or a pointer to documentation). While I support not making unnecessary changes, I'm not sure I understand if this one is necessary or not. (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

18 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR