Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Module: Mauser Support Facility
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 06:07:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
37 times
|
| |
|
|
Keith,
I have no horse and I'm not high. I never said I was the arbiter of
anything nor do I claim to be. You asked for unbiased opinions and you got
mine. How can you possibly say you don't like it, Mr. Smack-Daddy? YOU
ASKED FOR IT.
And yes, Mark, I could've clicked the other page, but what would you have
done? Do you want to see the facade, or do you want the truth? I wanted to
see the real Keith.
I could write more, but I'm fresh out of gasoline.
Dave
"Keith Goldman" <legomankeith@aol.com> wrote in message
news:HL8AIo.1y48@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.space, David Simmons wrote:
>
> > Whether it's five unfolded fingers across the face or a shot in the arm,
> > smack is just bad for you and everybody else.
>
> David you just don't get it. Where I come from, smack is the time honored
> rhetorical tradition of trash-talk, including, but not exclusive to • mom-bashing.
> Smack is not bad for you, in some circles its a great source for humor, • and
> sharpening of the critical wit.
>
> > The impression that I get, judging by your writing style, that "smack" • is
> > just another way of sayingthat you have a rude attitude, and you don't • care
> > who knows it or who is offended by it. That's selfish and childish and • it
> > won't get you respect. The Iron Reich apparently has attitude to spare, • and
> > that's cool, but when it comes to your attitude, spare us.
>
> I'm not sure who made you the arbiter of of good taste and the proper • measure of
> attitude, but spare me the high horse, brother. I realize that lugnet is • not
> really the proper forum for most smack, so I confine it to mocpages where • I find
> a greater freedom to dole out my brand of humor. Its not for everyone, so • go to
> brickshelf next time, don't expose yourself to the irritant. I always • offer a
> smack-free option. Yes, I crossed the line with the c.w. reference in • this
> thread. I was taken to task by the good curator, and I won't make the • same
> mistake again. If you don't like this brand of humor, tune out. I don't • post
> that often, and I see it as a small change of pace from the regular, • oustanding,
> civilized, friendly fare. But by criticizing my attutude, you have • yourself
> partaken of a smack-sandwich, and that is too cool. And as for • respect...ah its
> overrated and at the end of the day won't buy you a cup o' coffee. You • are
> right about one thing though. I am childish, not selfish, but definetly
> childish. Don't we all play with toys here...?
>
> > Oh, and regarding the recent changes to the Moonbase Standard: most of • the
> > time, change is good and presents you with a challenge. Are you up to • it or
> > not?
>
> Obviously I'm up to it, I raised the support pillars. What, now I can't • offer
> an opinion on the changes? There you go being the arbiter again.
>
> > Honest enough for you?!
>
> Of course, this is what I'm trying to get at. If my Mausers suck (which • judging
> by the current tally of votes they do) then I want to hear it. I'd rather • have
> Jon Palmer tell me my mech sucks, than Jimmy-moc-maker telling me great • job!
> Keep building! I don't get my feelings hurt, I love the smack, the bottom • line
> is... I think its funny, and I know I'm not alone.
>
> > BTW, I really like the dark gray, boxy, fascist look here. It reminds • me of
> > the production design of "Equilibrium", a very cool movie I would • recommend
> > if you like this kind of austere, authoritarian style (and also if you • like
> > smack-filled action!). Big Daddy Mars is very intimidating. I like the
> > legs and solar panels? The smaller mech is just too spindly-lookin'.
> > However, I do like the foot design, those toes are groovy.
>
> Thanks for the props David, and I have seen Equilibrium, you are right, • its a
> great b-movie.
>
> > Dave (who doesn't mind a smack or two as long I get a reacharound!)
>
> Who's your daddy, Dave?
> -Keith (smack-daddy)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
