Subject:
|
Re: Strategic Rating (Was: Re: Next and Prev buttons or links)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 02:08:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1266 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger writes:
> > what if instead of seeing a number as the rating (which we can all read
> > and react to) we'll see it as a color - anywhere from #00FF00 for 100 to
> > #FF0000 for 0 - it won't be obvious what the exact rating was (and it
> > doesn't really matter what it is), but we'll be able to tell what the
> > general idea is...
>
> In a way, it's kinda like that now, at least in the sense that the amount of
> color gets progressively stronger as more and more people give input. Thus,
> something rated by no one is pure gray, and something rated by only one or
> two people is pale red. It only turns strong red or strong black when there
> are about 5 or more people (it's a gradual fade).
Er, what I just wrote was backwards. You're talking about having color but
no numbers? How is that different from having the numbers? Even the 6x6x6
safe palette shows six gradations of red from black to red, and very few
people here (as a percentage) are running 8-bit anymore (from a survey here
a year ago, so it must be even lower now).
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
