Subject:
|
Re: Strategic Rating (Was: Re: Next and Prev buttons or links)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:23:07 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2839 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> I gave it a 0. That's my honest opinion of it,
Ah, fair enough - my rant was misdirected then :)
> I do appreciate Larry's drawing attention to it again, but from a
> scoring and noise standpoint, it does nobody (well, I can only speak for
> myself) any good to have to read the same request twice. It makes sense to
> me to mark duplicate info down if the time delta is small, especially in the
> same group and on the same thread. I rated the post above it (the original)
> an 80 and probably would have rated the duplicate also an 80 (or maybe a 90)
> if several months had passed instead of only 2 days. HTH,
That's reasonable, although from a users perspective, it's often hard to tell
whether an idea has been considered, or automatically sent to /dev/null :) If
there was something like.. oooh, I dunno.. I feature request page maybe this
wouldn't happen, and would encourage more people to give ideas?
*grins and runs*
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
