Subject:
|
Re: Strategic Rating (Was: Re: Next and Prev buttons or links)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 01:29:30 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
705 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> > Looking at the ratings for your post, it's got a 100 and a 0, maybe it isn't
> > worth 100, but is it really worth a 0? Or is the person rating it a 0 trying
> > to influence the overall rating rather than give their true opinion? Maybe • it
> > doesn't matter in the scheme of things, but I'm getting bored of this
> > strategic rating.
> >
> > To me it's like saying, "My opinion is worth more than yours, so I'm going • to
> > lie just to block out your opinion". I find it rather obnoxious!
>
> I gave it a 0. That's my honest opinion of it, in relation to the articles
> around it.
OK. I still think Richard's on to something with "strategic rating" though.
Why did I repost? I wouldn't have reposted it if I hadn't thought it had
dropped into a black hole. If I had waited 2 months to repost I may well have
forgotten. (I don't keep a list of what UI changes maybe need to happen,
that's not my job)
If you'd said "hmm..." I would not have reposted. But it was a "plunk" with no
response. Just like 1/2 my mail to you, seems like. You have a pending factor
request I haven't heard back on, for example...
++Lar
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
