Subject:
|
Re: Strategic Rating (Was: Re: Next and Prev buttons or links)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:25:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
862 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> I gave it a 0. That's my honest opinion of it, in relation to the articles
> around it. It repeated something only 2 days old and one node up on the same
> thread. I do appreciate Larry's drawing attention to it again, but from a
> scoring and noise standpoint, it does nobody (well, I can only speak for
> myself) any good to have to read the same request twice. It makes sense to
> me to mark duplicate info down if the time delta is small, especially in the
BTW, when I say "to mark duplicate info down" I mean down as far as possible,
not down w.r.t. other opinions or w.r.t. the composite rating. I still would
have rated it a 0 even if there hadn't already been a 100 on it prior to my
rating it. I try _real_ hard to ignore other ratings when coming up with my
own.
--Todd
> same group and on the same thread. I rated the post above it (the original)
> an 80 and probably would have rated the duplicate also an 80 (or maybe a 90)
> if several months had passed instead of only 2 days. HTH,
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
