Subject:
|
Re: Strategic Rating (Was: Re: Next and Prev buttons or links)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:36:59 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
828 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> BTW, when I say "to mark duplicate info down" I mean down as far as possible,
> not down w.r.t. other opinions or w.r.t. the composite rating. I still would
> have rated it a 0 even if there hadn't already been a 100 on it prior to my
> rating it. I try _real_ hard to ignore other ratings when coming up with my
> own.
When we have the tables, and the auto-sorting of rated messages.. will we need
to see the actual ratings for individual posts?
It could solve the problem of being influenced by others, and the problem of
depressing people by giving them a less than 50 score. I agree that the
*entire* scale should be used, but if I rated down every conversational, or
otherwise below-average post.. then a lot more feelings would be hurt! Even
seeing a 45 next to your post can be taken too personally sometimes - and I'm
not sure that that is something that is just going to go away either :/
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
