Subject:
|
Re: Strategic Rating (Was: Re: Next and Prev buttons or links)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 01:20:12 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1152 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Franks wrote:
>
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> > BTW, when I say "to mark duplicate info down" I mean down as far as possible,
> > not down w.r.t. other opinions or w.r.t. the composite rating. I still would
> > have rated it a 0 even if there hadn't already been a 100 on it prior to my
> > rating it. I try _real_ hard to ignore other ratings when coming up with my
> > own.
>
> When we have the tables, and the auto-sorting of rated messages.. will we need
> to see the actual ratings for individual posts?
>
> It could solve the problem of being influenced by others, and the problem of
> depressing people by giving them a less than 50 score. I agree that the
> *entire* scale should be used, but if I rated down every conversational, or
> otherwise below-average post.. then a lot more feelings would be hurt! Even
> seeing a 45 next to your post can be taken too personally sometimes - and I'm
> not sure that that is something that is just going to go away either :/
what if instead of seeing a number as the rating (which we can all read
and react to) we'll see it as a color - anywhere from #00FF00 for 100 to
#FF0000 for 0 - it won't be obvious what the exact rating was (and it
doesn't really matter what it is), but we'll be able to tell what the
general idea is...
Just a thought
:)
Dan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
