Subject:
|
Re: Strategic Rating (Was: Re: Next and Prev buttons or links)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:10:01 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
560 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> Looking at the ratings for your post, it's got a 100 and a 0, maybe it isn't
> worth 100, but is it really worth a 0? Or is the person rating it a 0 trying
> to influence the overall rating rather than give their true opinion? Maybe it
> doesn't matter in the scheme of things, but I'm getting bored of this
> strategic rating.
>
> To me it's like saying, "My opinion is worth more than yours, so I'm going to
> lie just to block out your opinion". I find it rather obnoxious!
I gave it a 0. That's my honest opinion of it, in relation to the articles
around it. It repeated something only 2 days old and one node up on the same
thread. I do appreciate Larry's drawing attention to it again, but from a
scoring and noise standpoint, it does nobody (well, I can only speak for
myself) any good to have to read the same request twice. It makes sense to
me to mark duplicate info down if the time delta is small, especially in the
same group and on the same thread. I rated the post above it (the original)
an 80 and probably would have rated the duplicate also an 80 (or maybe a 90)
if several months had passed instead of only 2 days. HTH,
--Todd
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
