Subject:
|
Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:32:57 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1472 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
| |
Given the current make up of the LTT (who’ve usurped the role as Admin)...
|
I missed the significance of this on the first reading, but it got me thinking:
Eventually, I assume the LUGNET Transition Team is going to hand over control
to some other governing body once it gets sorted what the future for LUGNET is
going to be. My question is:
Do the members of the governing body have to be the same people that moderate(1)
the forums?
It seems seperating the two responsibilities would allow people to apply their
strengths to those areas where they can do the most good. It would allow a
greater number of people to participate in running the site, sharing the load so
people have more time to build or participate in that thing we call Real Life.
:-) More people participating = more sense of ownership and hopefully would
lead to greater community building down the road.
Forgive me if this has all been hashed out before (I haven’t followed every
thread here), but I thought I’d just throw this nugget out there...
Mark
(1) I know, LUGNET does not like to use the term “moderate”, but I use the
term because “administrate” implies (to me) the role of making policy decisions,
etc., as well.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Context: LUGNET is not a democracy
|
| (...) Just to let you know, this feeling is not limited to NELUG. In fact it is an international concern. If Larry were not an admin I wouldn't care, but he *is* and admin and therefore it affects LUGNET significantly. Unfortunatly there is no (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
