 | | Re: a few new things
|
|
Well, I don't want to come off as overly combative on this issue but I think Suz's design was fine and absolutely heading in the right direction. Keep in mind that the screen shot she posted first was a screen shot of her whole screen (the browser, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) But I did post via the web. Jude (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Screwy email for Server
|
|
(...) yah, proper "vacation" programs should know not to respond to "bulk" mail. Unfortunately, some of the more common implementations are not so smart. (...) that is because that mail server (I think it's exchange?) does not reply to mail (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Screwy email for Server
|
|
I posted this message to robotics (URL) got two out of office replies. This I understand why but I wish people would put an exception for subscriptions. grrrrr But why did I get the message below from the Lugnet Server? Jude Message: From: LUGNET (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) Ooops, sorry...... didn't mean to give that impression. There's nothing wrong with good design; quite the contrary. I was simply trying to suggest that the design I saw there appeared somewhat too business-like. Perhaps I can clarify with (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) How can someone take such a statement the wrong way? As far as I can tell, you are advocating BAD DESIGN as something that will somehow benefit new users -- in which case, I have to strongly disagree. Good design choices are to everyone's (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) This looks really interesting. Is this intended to be a print mag? Or an e-zine? Either way, it looks very exciting. (...) It looks so very corporate. The design is almost too snazy. The clean lines, the co-ordinated colors. All very high (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) programming and UI design effort, perhaps with the Market section? (...) A thought: This seems to me to have a lot in common with the Market idea. (...) newsgroups there. However I wouldn't recommend redesigning the whole thing, just add a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) Hi! (...) Woho! (...) I know of a great contact that is the cheapest, boasts the highest quality stuff and is the nicest guy. This is first hand, he is printing for my org. (...) Please explain this further... (...) Yeah! (...) Shoot. (...) To (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
Suz: I'll start small and work my way in... While it's not a big issue - the use of CSS could help y'all maintain uniformity of appearance across all the pages of the site with a small, reusable bit of "code" -- but then again, I don't really see a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Does lugnet have the right 'look and feel'?
|
|
(...) Well, it's a little busy, but most portals are. Maybe the better question to ask is if the NGs are really what Lugnet is. There's a lot that Lugnet offers, and not everyone might want to use the forums or think they're that important-there's (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) Okay, this is a little more appropriate: (URL) comments from everyone so far! -Suz (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) Doh! Sorry for this confusion.. you're seeing my web browser in a screenshot. I'll crop the picture down right now, so it's just the homepage. -Suz (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:Gx9574.qt@lugnet.com... (...) of (...) is (...) from the (...) often (...) stick (...) have (...) blah, (...) The following are just my opinions, so don't be too offended by them... I think that (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) I would like a button. I really hate (for example, sorry Dan) peeron.com, where I type in a set number, then click "sets", and have to click back on the text field & hit enter. (...) My advice would be "restraint". The home page is more for (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) of (...) A few comments: My monitor is set for 1024 pixel width and I still have to scroll sideways to see everything. A lot of people are still on 800x600 even. Some of the labels on the button bar at the top say "LUGNET xxx" and some don't. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: a few new things
|
|
(...) Great work! About the search button question - I think that it would be a good idea to have a button, some people might feel lost without one. It's better to have an extra way to do something than to not have enough. A small suggestion: have a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | a few new things
|
|
hi. for those of you who love progress... I have a few things to reveal that are not ready for "real" announcement yet. I'm open to feedback as I work. (I know how you guys *love* to provide feedback.. wink) I started an Admin Help Wanted list: (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What's next for MindStorms
|
|
(...) only that the offending messages come from one of the mailing lists gateways - we have very little control what the list accepts - so unlike mails sent to LUGNET directly, we can't block broken mailers (like some exchange versions, iirc), that (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What's next for MindStorms
|
|
(...) My replies appear to thread correctly... I was referring to this thread, starting here: (URL) reply to 18038 which appears in this thread: (URL) is a reply to 18033 appearing in the original thread: (URL) clues here? -Rob. (22 years ago, 3-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
