|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.429) |
|
| | Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) Demonstrate the need to own LEGO, then. What a silly question. No one should have to demonstrate needs here. We're talking about acquisition of property. If I have the resources, and the acquisition of property per se does not infringe the (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.425) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 3.421) |
|
| | Re: Permission Req'd for Education?
|
| (...) I think just an overreation. I know if you ask the publisher, they will typically say, "No!" and inside the book cover it says you cannot reproduce anything, but the fair use doctrine says otherwise. You would have to copy a lot from a book to (...) (20 years ago, 30-Aug-04, to lugnet.edu, FTX)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 3.419) |
|
| | Re: rights to SW pieces
|
| (...) I was always under the impression that 'Star Wars elements' would mean such things as the logo, names and possibly the clothing designs. An element is not neccasarily a physical object, merely an idea or design. If you look more carefully you (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.418) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 3.412) |
|
| | Re: Mecha Legs
|
| (...) You should have *both*: Copyright © 2000 Matthew Miller. All Rights Reserved. The last phrase doesn't do anything in the US, but apparently is good to have for some other countries. (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.publish)
| |
| all, rights (score: 3.410) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.409) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.407) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.406) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.406) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.406) |
|
| | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| (...) What gives the government the right to discriminate among contracts? It is then making a moral judgement that one sort of free will behaviour non rights damaging behaviour is better than another. Please address this fundamental point. (...) No (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.399) |
|
| | Re: Why TLG doesn't have a leg to stand on anymore.
|
| (...) Copyright laws are pretty the much the same for the reasons you list, with a few exceptions. However, lego cad programs don't infringe on *any* copyrights, only Trademarks and (possibly, but not likely) intelectual property rights. (...) It (...) (25 years ago, 16-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.392) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 3.388) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.388) |
|
| | Re: LEGO section starting on Compuserve
|
| The Compuserve copyright rules and regulations explicitly state that owners of material uploaded to Compuserve retain ownership and rights. Compuserve gains only a compilation copyright. Here is the relevent document: ------- Begin ------- (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
| rights, property (score: 3.387) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 3.382) |
|
| | FS: LOTS of CHEAP new sets!
|
| Hi all, Well, I did it again. I managed to deal with a Wal-Mart and in return for annihilating their clearance aisle, I got a small discount. So I'm passing this along to all of you in the hopes of recouping my cost, because I really don't need all (...) (25 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
| all, rights (score: 3.381) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 3.379) |