To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1452
1451  |  1453
Subject: 
Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 10 Jul 1999 13:35:25 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@/nomorespam/novera.com
Viewed: 
1191 times
  
<3785FAB8.391B@mindspring.com> <378640fa.5882690@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Steve Bliss wrote:

Actually, it's an old law.  And the guy didn't just utter the f-word a few
times, he was all aggro-ed out, and shouting so people a fair distance away
could hear him, and on and on.

Personally, I don't care what language he was using.  He sounded like
someone who needed a clear lesson on the difference between the 1st
Amendment and Public Nuisance.

Ninety days seems a bit extreme, but a hefty fine would have been in order.

I mostly come to the same conclusion you do but for different reasons.

While the owner has the right to impose whatever restrictions or
requirements he wishes on visitors to his property, many restrictions
(such as against cursing, styles of dress, and etc.) are not justifiable
on public property.

So the law against cursing in public should be struck down. (1)

This feller should have been prosecuted under threatening behaviour and
public nuisance restrictions

1 - an example of my general tendency to want to get rid of specific
prohibitions and use the common law which usually can do a fine job of
taking care of the ill that the specific prohibition is trying to
address


--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com  http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.

NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
(...) Actually, we had the same reasons. You just described it much better. Steve (25 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
"Christopher L. Weeks" wrote: <snipped a lot of incendiary rhetoric> I feel as though the climate in this newsgroup had grown very hostile. So much so, that I am going to unsubscribe from it because I choose not expose myself what I feel is (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR