Subject:
|
Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Jul 1999 16:08:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1133 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 10 Jul 1999 13:35:25 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> I mostly come to the same conclusion you do but for different reasons.
>
> While the owner has the right to impose whatever restrictions or
> requirements he wishes on visitors to his property, many restrictions
> (such as against cursing, styles of dress, and etc.) are not justifiable
> on public property.
>
> So the law against cursing in public should be struck down. (1)
>
> This feller should have been prosecuted under threatening behaviour and
> public nuisance restrictions
>
> 1 - an example of my general tendency to want to get rid of specific
> prohibitions and use the common law which usually can do a fine job of
> taking care of the ill that the specific prohibition is trying to
> address
Actually, we had the same reasons. You just described it much better.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
