Subject:
|
Re: 22/7 & infinities (was: Re: The nature of the JC god, good or evil?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Sep 1999 14:13:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1410 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > > > agreement. "I won't take your things, but you can't take mine." This • limits the
> > > > child from taking/destroying/whatever other people's property (a slight • loss);
> > > > but prevents others from doing the same to his/her property (a bigger • gain, I
> > > > would argue).
> > >
> > > I think the Libertarians are fixated here, and think this is their ultimate
> > goal.
> >
> > I am not a Libertarian, so I am not at liberty to answer that.
> > Personally, though, I think its very important.
>
> I'm not really sure What JohnN means. Property rights as and issue is
> certainly central to the Libertarian philosophy. And I agree that it is
> very important.
Not to jump in for John N here, but I think this is just resultant of what was
cut off in replies... I think what he was getting at was a sense of ethical
equality, which he said is central to Libertarianism. The top bit looks like
it was cut off here... I think I had been using rights of property as an
example in my paragraph about ethical equality (see original post of mine which
John responded to)
laterz,
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
277 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
