Subject:
|
Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 20:37:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1851 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Ahui Herrera writes:
> I just finsihed the transcitps the of Q&A with Brad Justin at Brickswest.
> On the question of 10,000. This is what he said.
>
> Question 39: How limied (on train engine) is limited?
>
> Answer: "It's a seriesm of 10,000. We run out of the numbered ones at
> 10,000 and then will we see how it goes."
>
>
> ***************
> From my understand of this I'm taking it that if the demand for engines
> after the first 10,000 is still high they might make more but these next
> 'batch' MAY NOT be numbered! Anyone else at brickswest want to comment on
> this. -AHui
That is how I also heard it. My interpretation was that *IF* any more were
produced, they would not be numbered (this was not implied one way or
another, just my interpretation\opinion.)
-Mark (#2)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
| (...) I understood it as Mark did. Personally, after 10,000, I rather see a *different* engine run of 10,000 and have the Super Chief go out of production for a while (based on the fact that LD can only have so many different sets in production at (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
| I just finsihed the transcitps the of Q&A with Brad Justin at Brickswest. On the question of 10,000. This is what he said. Question 39: How limied (on train engine) is limited? Answer: "It's a seriesm of 10,000. We run out of the numbered ones at (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
