To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 19654
19653  |  19655
Subject: 
Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 15:05:23 GMT
Viewed: 
3346 times
  
but wher is the fun?

my skirt has been done as a cut of the sphere
the same shapa as the tunnel has to hav (i think)
so it was a middle part of sphere without upper and lower domes
that's why i said "a little bit hard to do it" :))

you said CD is too big
?
CD has 5 1/4 inch so it's not much bigger than you said - 4 inches
but i suppose you are right!

have a look here
http://web.mit.edu/sp.742/www/motor.html

i must check the weight of lego-motors to use your formulas
but they are useful - thanx

i've been trying 12V
and read somewhere that 18V quadruple torque!
so:
aprox:
0.37W * 4 = 1.5W
and 1hp = ca 750W
so lego motor has 0.002 hp
so
we can lift ca 0.3lb
so i think lego motor cannot lift itself
so end of topic isn't it?

the answer is: you stole whole fun from this issue :((((
and now - me too :(((((((((((((

:)
best regards
pixel



"Jim Choate" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.33.0211290805310.1275-100000@einstein.ssz.com...
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, pixel wrote:

1. pure turbine has to be placed in some kind of tunnel but not exactly
funnel
    the tunnel has to be as a part of ball (sphere) without hats :)) at • the
upper and the lower side
    because the stream of air has to compact and air cannot escape near • the
blade of rotor or turbine

Bingo.

2. lego motor http://peeron.com/inv/parts/2838c01 is the only one useful
because the new motor has no enough speed

Take a look at some of these micro motors that are being used in the new
mini-RC cars. You can buy a whole car kit, radio, and controller for about
$75US.

3. propeler has to be non-lego beacause of weight and shape and • stability

A helo tail rotor is your best bet. Wood or a composite is your best bet.
Stay away from -any- metal blades as they are a serious safety hazard in
this application.

4. turbine can be weighty so motor can rotate it and keep the speed
(flywheel)

No, you don't need a turbine. What you're missing is the ratio of the
inlet area to exhaust plenum area and the delta-v of the air flow.

200lb's will get a good lift from 1/4hp.

200lb's   weight of hover
------- = ---------------
1/4hp     power of motor

5. good turbine is cd-disc :)) cut on chords and bent termicaly (it's • heavy
enough) (you need some tools to do it)

Yuck. A CD disk is -way- too big across, and it's aerodynamic efficiency
is insufficient to move enough air. At high air speeds the flat 'blades'
will stall and you will find the flow going down with increases in fan
speed. Your fan shouldn't be more than about 4 inches across.

6. for me it's impossible to do lego frame light enough (in fact lego • parts
are heavy especialy axles)

I suspect this isn't true. I'd start with a standard green plate and
eschew the whole idea of a frame, insufficient rigidity in Lego plastic.

7. making skirt is very important (i did it from plastic bag) it's a • little
bit hard to do it

Shouldn't be. I'd suspect it's your process, remember you -must- pleat the
corners or the skirt will dump. Hint, the pleats -must- be vertical with
respect to the running board/ground reference frame.

If you're making a tubular skirt then you want to make it in eight (8)
seperate sections. Four (4) straight tubular pieces, use a wood dowel
or a similar form to make. Then the four (4) corner pieces.


--
    ____________________________________________________________________

    We don't see things as they are,                      ravage@ssz.com
    we see them as we are.                                   www.ssz.com
                                                  jchoate@open-forge.org
    Anais Nin                                         www.open-forge.org

    --------------------------------------------------------------------





Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
 
(...) Non-lego motor -- for lower weight and higher RPM. Non-lego skirt -- because there isn't anything in Lego that can do that. Non-lego propellor -- because the Lego ones are crap Non-lego decking -- for lightness and rigidity. ...hmmm it's (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
  Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
 
(...) You'll have to answer that for yourself. A lot of what I find fun would probably bore/scare most to death. For example, I find all these transformers and such that a lot of Mindstorm folks rave over completely and utterly uninteresting, and (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
 
(...) Bingo. (...) Take a look at some of these micro motors that are being used in the new mini-RC cars. You can buy a whole car kit, radio, and controller for about $75US. (...) A helo tail rotor is your best bet. Wood or a composite is your best (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)

32 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR