Robotics : 19650


Robotics / 19650	19649 \| 19651

Subject:	RE: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
Newsgroups:	lugnet.robotics
Date:	Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:19:55 GMT
Reply-To:	<(marco@soporcel.)NoMoreSpam(pt)>
Viewed:	2961 times

pixel wrote: > if i will use non lego or znap propeler will you disqualificate me? :) LOL! No ! I myself am doing tests with a non-LEGO one also. it would be nice if it could use a LEGO motor... and material usually found in every home, so anyone could build one... if we ever find a way to make it possible. > because IMO some kind of turbine is needed here Yep. Do you have any clever trick to do it ? (besides using a turbine from a hovercraft kit ;) > i'll try to do it tonight good ! the more trying the better :) mc.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
hi! so i did tests and my discoveries are sad 1. pure turbine has to be placed in some kind of tunnel but not exactly funnel the tunnel has to be as a part of ball (sphere) without hats :)) at the upper and the lower side because the stream of air (...) (21 years ago, 29-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
if i will use non lego or znap propeler will you disqualificate me? :) be cause IMO some kind of turbine is needed here i'll try to do it tonight (21 years ago, 28-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)

32 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search