Subject:
|
Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 May 2005 20:46:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3544 times
|
| |
|
|
"David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message
news:IH42Lw.1wsw@lugnet.com...
[ ... snipped ... ]
>
> What aspect of the term do you feel is inaccurate? From your post, it • would seem
> that you object to the word "fan", because it implies a stronger • dedication than
> the word "hobbyist"? Of course, the resulting acronym with "Hobbyist" is • ..
> uh... a touch more vulger :) Would "enthusiast" work?
[... snipped ... ]
Yes, I believe you are correct, it is the term "fan" I have an issue with.
When I hear to see the term AFOL, I think "Adult Fan of the LEGO Company".
While there are a lot of things I like and respect about LEGO the Company,
there are a number of things I don't care for either. So I wouldn't call
myself a "Fan" of LEGO the company any more than I would call myself AFOAB
(Adult Fan of Anheuser-Busch). While I purchase and enjoy their products, I
don't consider myself a "Fan" of either company per se, certainly not enough
to label myself.
As I mentioned in my other post, I consider myself a LEGO Hobbyist.
Mike
--
Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring.com
http://www.ncltc.cc - North Carolina LEGO Train Club
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
| (...) What aspect of the term do you feel is inaccurate? From your post, it would seem that you object to the word "fan", because it implies a stronger dedication than the word "hobbyist"? Of course, the resulting acronym with "Hobbyist" is .. uh... (...) (19 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
