Subject:
|
Re: Classic Windows: 32c - Not yet confirmed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:54:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1985 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/chris.w.dee/LDrawClassicWindows/
>
> Hmm, this doesn't look good. I have 6 red, 2 white, and 1 yellow door w open
> stud, no hole. All of them right. It seems too many to be coincidential...
>
>
> /Tore
I'm not sure what you are saying here. 32.dat is the left (hinged) door with the
knob on the right.
Do you mean you have 9 copies of
http://guide.lugnet.com/partsref/search.cgi?q=32 all with no hole?
If true, it is certainly strange that all of my type 32 parts do have a hole and
all of my 33 parts have no hole. I'll check again tonight, but pretty sure I
recorded my findings correctly.
The discussion is probably acamdemic, since the presence or absence of the small
hole alone is non-functional, and seems to be correlated with the long ledge (on
parts that have a ledge). So for 32 and 33 I propose only to release two
versions :
..a : Solid stud, hole
..b : Hollow stud, hole (since we know this exists on 32 and 33) OR
..c : Hollow stud, no hole (if we can prove 32 without hole)
Does this make sense?
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Classic Windows: 32c - Not yet confirmed
|
| (...) With too little sleep, I'm not sure what I'm saying either... :) Let me see... I have 9 copies of 33cc01 and no copy of 32c[c01] I have lots of 32bc01 and 33bc01, I won't even count them. Then I have two or more copies of 33ac01 but no 32ac01 (...) (20 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
