To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 5477
5476  |  5478
Subject: 
Re: Wheel Arrangement (Re: Stupid question about steam engines)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 13:14:45 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
985 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Simon Denscombe writes:

To Simon, thanks, I will, when I get a chance. To the extent that I agree with
it, anyway. It speaks authoritatively but neglects to mention that what it says
is not universally accepted.

To everyone. PLEASE do not send me courtesy copies of your posts. It's a
DIScourtesy, because I think I need to respond directly. Detestable habit.

IF you MUST do it, please note that it's a copy of a post yourself, manually,
in the first line of your screed. Otherwise you are wasting my time.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Wheel Arrangement (Re: Stupid question about steam engines)
 
(...) says (...) Yep, it's a British book for British people and the standard is accepted completely here. I'm going to LDraw a 'Le Shuttle' Channel Tunnel locomotive one day - it's a Bo-Bo-Bo. Carbon 60 (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Wheel Arrangement (Re: Stupid question about steam engines)
 
(...) You might want to add this to your info page or something: "For main line diesel and electric locomotives the system whereby the number of driven axles on a bogie or frame is denoted by a letter (A=1, B=2, C=3 etc.) and the number of undriven (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains)

28 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR